To display the most relevant entries to you in priority,
vote for the stories you are interested in
(  )
and reject those that you are not interested in
(  )
Infos Fabula -
1 hours and 14 minutes ago
Call for papers: Typology of labile verbs: Focus on diachrony Thessaloniki, Greece, 3-5 April 2009
The term ‘labile' refers to verbs or verbal forms which can show valency
alternation, i.e. changes in syntactic pattern, with no formal change in the verb. Very often (but
not always) the term ‘labile' is only employed to refer to verbs (or verbal
forms) which can be employed both transitively and intransitively, as in (1-2); some scholars use
other, less widely accepted terms in this sense, such as ‘ambitransitive' (R. M.
W. Dixon 1994) or ‘optionally transitive' (J. G. Miller 1993): (1) English a.
John broke the vase b. The vase broke (2) Greek a. O Janis efage mesimeriano the:NOM Janis:NOM
ate:3SG lunch:ACC ‘Janis ate lunch' b. O Janis efage the:NOM Janis:NOM ate:3SG
‘Janis ate' (1) exemplifies Patient-preserving lability (P-lability), while (2)
instantiates an Agent-preserving lability (A-lability). Other types of syntactic alternation, such
as locative alternation (cf. John sprayed paint on the wall ~ John sprayed the wall with paint) or
dative shift (Mary gave John an apple ~ Mary gave an apple to John) are usually treated separately
from P- and A-lability. Of particular interest is P-lability, common in ergative-absolutive
languages (for instance, in many Daghestan languages), quite frequent also in some
nominative-accusative languages (such as English, Greek, German or French), but (almost) entirely
lacking in many others (e.g. in Slavic or Uralic).Although there are a number of studies dealing
with this phenomenon in individual languages, such as English (e.g. Keyser Roeper 1984; McMillion
2006), French (Larjavaara 2000), Greek (Alexiadou Anagnostopoulou 1999, 2004,
Theophanopoulou-Kontou 1983-4, 2004, Tsimpli 1989, 2006) and some others, a cross-linguistic study
of lability is rather neglected (with a few exceptions such as Letuchiy 2006). Even less attention
has been paid to the diachronic aspects of labile verbs. In many cases, we cannot explain why and
how the lability emerges and disappears. We do not know why in several languages labile verbs
become more productive and the class of labile verbs is constantly increasing (as in English, Greek
or some Daghestan languages), while in some other languages this class is decreasing (as in
Sanskrit) or entirely lacking (as in modern Turkic or Kartvelian languages). Only a few mechanisms
responsible for the emergence of lability (such as the phonetic merger of transitive and
intransitive forms or the deletion of the reflexive pronoun, attested in the history of English)
are mentioned in the literature. The few studies dealing with the diachronic aspects of labile
verbs, their rise, development or decay and loss include Kitazume 1996 (on English), Kulikov 2003
(on [...]

|
TechCrunch -
14 hours and 35 minutes ago
This guest post is written by Matt
Rutherford, Web Strategist and technology producer for Charlie
Rose. Matt focuses on the macro themes affecting the internet and the wider world.
In an intimate interview with Charlie Rose on PBS tonight, and available here, Stanford
professor Larry Lessig
reveals some profound views on copyright, remix culture, and the new hybrid economy that is
emerging.
In particular, Lessig speaks out against the abolitionist movement growing against copyright:
My real fear is that the last 10 years have unleashed a kind of revolutionary attitude among the
generation that will take over in 10 years. And it will be hard for them to distinguish between
sensible copyright legislation and the kind that we’ve got right now. So my real fear is
we’re going to lose control of this animal... I just want to reform [copyright] to make it
make sense.
A reform of copyright is clearly overdue. We require a new form of regulation that takes into
account the ease and speed of digital distribution and appropriation. Every week, books cross my
desk clamoring for this change - some of which are certainly worth reading. And as Lessig
explains on the show, it’s counterproductive to continue to criminalize kids for
file-sharing, remixing and recreating with content. Copyright was established to encourage
creativity, not stifle it.
Cultural Roots
Lessig thinks on a macro time scale. For him, the emerging “read-write creativity”
seen on YouTube and elsewhere is actually a return to our natural cultural roots. Historically,
man has always absorbed and re-created culture – the symbolic retelling of
stories and re-interpreting of songs on the front porch. It is only the emergence of mass media
in the last century that caused us to accept a passive relationship with culture.
What’s so extraordinary about the last four years is that they’ve demonstrated that
the technology of the internet is giving us a chance to go back to the way culture has been from
the beginning…Only the 20th century was a deviation from this. But from the beginning of
culture, it was a normal thing for people to be able to create and recreate the most important
parts of culture that were around them.
As evidence of this, Lessig cites the numerous Charlie Rose remix videos that are floating around
the web.
I’ve seen some of these Rose remixes, and they are enormous. They’re fantastic. But I
would hope, you know, eventually you could be in a position to say I want to encourage this,
please. Please do it.
A lot of these remixes also come across my desk. In the spirit of research, here are a few of the
best so far: Beckett, Kung Fu, nuclear weapons.
They’re all superb. And yes, we do encourage this. As Lessig says, Please do it.
Hybrid Economy
There remains the fundamental question of how a ‘new’ copyright can
maintain revenue. After all, despite the ease of pointing out the flaws in the current system,
it’s quite another matter to propose a viable alternative. Lessig sees the solution, in
part, coming from a new hybrid economy, one that combines the traditional commercial economy with
sharing economies seen in Wikipedia, YouTube and elsewhere:
Businesses have begun to realize that the world is in part divided between commercial economies
like buying and selling books, and sharing economies like Wikipedia where enormous value is
produced for nothing, people are doing it all for free. The most interesting thing I think
we’ve seen though in the last five years is the development of a hybrid economy where
commercial entities are trying to leverage value out of these sharing economies or vice versa,
sharing economies trying to leverage value out of commercial entities. And this hybrid depends
upon the commercial entity showing the proper respect for the creation in the sharing economy,
and giving space to it, encouraging it so that the sharing economy can produce enormous value
that is beneficial to the people inside, and also to the commercial business.
Lessig’s Big Idea
Lessig concludes the interview with his ‘big idea’. It is an inspiring,
and elegant reminder that we are in the midst of an unprecedented social change. Just as the
Gutenberg press facilitated the spread of the Protestant Reformation, fundamentally altering the
course of Western civilization, so too is the internet beginning to spark tectonic changes, the
breadth of which we don’t yet have the historical perspective to grasp. As Lessig explains:
I think the big idea, as every big idea is, is just one amazing step beyond where we are right
now. And I think you think about the Obama campaign, something like Wikipedia, something like the
stuff that’s going on on the Internet, the kind that I think of as read write culture. What
it really is doing is reviving the sense that people can do something. Not the passive couch
potato politics or couch potato culture, but that they can do something. We’re close to
making it really effective. I think the next cycle, what you’re going to see in the way
politics functions, will be unrecognizable, even from today. But when we’re there, it will
be a revival of ideals, aspirations about democracy that will surprise us. The cynicism that we
had in the 20th century will look very 20th century.
Larry Lessig’s interview on Charlie Rose was first broadcast on Friday 11/21/08 on PBS, and
is available in full or in clips: Larry Lessig
(full segment), Larry Lessig
(clips). Matt Rutherford can be reached at matt@charlierose.com.
Crunch Network: CrunchBase the
free database of technology companies, people, and investors


|
InfoWorld: Top News -
22 hours and 43 minutes ago
div class="rxbodyfield"p page="1" class="ArticleBody"a target="_blank"
href="http://www.nemertes.com/"Nemertes Research/a continued to throw cold water on the future of
the Internet this week, releasing a study projecting that demand for bandwidth on the Web would
exceed its capacity by 2012./pp align="right"a
href="http://ad.doubleclick.net/jump/idg.us.info.rss/news;pos=imu;tile=6;sz=336x280;skey=patch_management;pkey=security;ord=123456789?"
target="_blank" /img
src="http://ad.doubleclick.net/ad/idg.us.info.rss/news;pos=imu;tile=6;sz=336x280;skey=patch_management;pkey=security;ord=123456789?"
width="336" height="280" border="0" alt="" align="right"//a/pp page="1" class="ArticleBody"The
study, which is a follow-up to a target="_blank"
href="http://www.networkworld.com/columnists/2007/111907johnson.html"similar research/a Nemertes
conducted last year, projects that the current global economic recession will only delay rather
than eliminate the increased demand for bandwidth the firm predicted last year. Then, Nemertes
projected that traffic growth would eclipse supply by 2010, but the firm now says it has adjusted
its projections to reflect deteriorating global economic conditions./pp page="1"
class="ArticleBody"b[ Does the#160;a
href="http://www.infoworld.com/article/08/11/11/46FE-broadband-limits_1.html"bandwidth shortage
mean out Internet future is in danger/a? ]/b/pp page="1" class="ArticleBody"Nemertes emphasized it
is not projecting that the Internet will crash or shut down altogether. Rather, the typical user
probably will experience Internet quot;brownouts,quot; where such high-bandwidth applications as
high-definition video-streaming and peer-to-peer file-sharing will stop performing up to users#39;
expectations, the firm says.#160;/pp page="1" class="ArticleBody"During a presentation at an
Internet Innovation Alliance symposium this week, Nemertes analyst Mike Jude a target="_blank"
href="http://www.networkworld.com/news/2008/111908-alliance-national-broadband.html"said/a that one
consequence of declining Web performance would be that users would look less to the Internet to
deliver their desired applications. quot;More and more applications are coming online that will
drive expectations for service quality even higher,quot; he said. quot;I#39;m not saying that the
Internet is going to crash in 2011, but that people#39;s expectations are going to be throttled.
People will stop going to the Internet for those services.quot;/pp page="1" class="ArticleBody"One
big reason for the projected growth in traffic is the continuing emergence of virtual workers who
work from home or in remote branch offices located far away from companies#39; central offices,
Nemertes says. In particular, these remote workers quot;expect seamless communications, regardless
of where they conduct businessquot; and they quot;often require more advanced communication and
collaboration tools than those who work at headquarters,quot; including videoconferencing and Web
conferencing, the report says./pp page="1" class="ArticleBody"Another factor is simply the large
growth in high-bandwidth applications for users to employ. More ISPs in the coming years will
follow the lead of such companies as a target="_blank"
href="http://www.networkworld.com/news/2008/082908-critics-question-comcast-broadband.html"Comcast/a
and a target="_blank"
href="http://www.networkworld.com/news/2008/110408-att-trialing-dsl-bandwidth.html"ATamp;T/a trying
out bandwidth caps that will charge extra money each month for heavy bandwidth consumers, Nemertes
says. Although#160;a
href="http://www.infoworld.com/article/08/08/29/Comcast_sets_monthly_bandwidth_limit_for_customers_1.html"Comcast
now caps individual bandwidth consumption at a relatively high 250GB per month/a, average future
users will easily reach or surpass that bandwidth limit as they find higher-bandwidth applications
to use, the firm says./pp page="1" class="ArticleBody"quot;Though this traffic load is [currently]
more than typical, it certainly isn#39;t exceptional,quot; Nemertes reports. quot;This type of
usage will become typical over the next three to five years. The fact that Comcast#39;s network is,
by its own admission, not able to cope with such usage patterns is a clear indication that the
crunch we predicted last year is beginning to occur.quot;/pp page="1" class="ArticleBody"Looking
forward, Nemertes says that if this capacity issue is not addressed, the Internet will fracture
into a tiered system where companies with the most money will pay for specialized network
infrastructure that will ensure their content is delivered at higher speeds than non-favored
content./pp page="2" class="ArticleBody"This fractured system -- where certain entities can pay
extra money to give their content favored treatment -- is what advocates of a target="_blank"
href="http://www.networkworld.com/news/2008/092208-politicians-push-for-net-neutrality.html"network
neutrality/a have been working to avoid by preventing ISPs from discriminating against certain
types of content. The Nemertes report gloomily concludes that although the Internet will not shut
down entirely, it will experience a dramatic slowdown in innovation because quot;new content and
application providers will be handicapped by the relatively poorer performance of their offerings
vis-#224;-vis those created by the established players.quot;/p/divbr style=clear: both;/ a
href=http://www.pheedo.com/click.phdo?s=6f133e36fa7698c33d630eb489aa4407p=1img alt= style=border:
0; border=0 src=http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?s=6f133e36fa7698c33d630eb489aa4407p=1//a img
src=http://www.pheedo.com/feeds/tracker.php?i=6f133e36fa7698c33d630eb489aa4407 style=display: none;
border=0 height=1 width=1 alt=/

|
Rage3D Discussion Area - 75,85,87,93,99 -
1 days and 17 hours ago
"Yesterday we reported that GT200 to go 55nm silently? Non-ref Card hits early 09, and what
we’re even more interested is whether NVIDIA is going to unveil a flagship dual-GPU card
after the processing upgrades to 55nm. It’s known that AMD Radeon 4870X2 has become the most
powerful ”weapon” in its important meetings such as financial
report.
As informer tells, NVIDIA has decided to release GeForce GTX260 GX2 to hit back in January next
year. Anyway, we know the emergence of such a product is really the way to go."
http://en.expreview.com/2008/11/19/n...up-jan-09.html
|
Coolfer -
1 days and 20 hours ago
pAs another follow-up to a
href="http://www.coolfer.com/blog/archives/2008/11/the_lure_of_d2c.php"yesterday's post/a on a
speech by Ian Rogers (Topspin Media, ex-Yahoo Music) about, for lack of a better summary, the
future of music, here's a a
href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/19/ian-rogers-on-the-death-of-the-music-cd-business-i-dont-care/"link
to coverage today at TechCrunch/a. Skip the post and go straight to the commentary. You get
everything from (paraphrasing loosely here) "Technology will kill labels -- Kozmo.com should have
been the next eBay" to "Less popular music is less popular because it sucks." And plenty of opinion
in between. Rogers even left a comment./p pWhat is missing from the discussion is the competitive
role technology will play for music's middle class. Forget any Utopian ideas of a growing, more
self-sufficient middle class. I understand that may be difficult when we're frequently presented
with success stories big (Nine Inch Nails) and small (Josh Rouse). But don't forget the stories of
mediocrity and failure. There are plenty of them. Case studies and success stories sell a product
and a vision. They do not accurately represent the entire marketplace./p pThe best assumption is --
short of the emergence of government endowments and grants for everyday musicians -- the middle
class will stay about the same size, and consuming spending on music will stay about the same.
Given those assumptions, middle class artists will use digital technologies in heightened
competition with other artists. New tools aren't about growing the middle class, they're about
enabling a portion of artists to divert money away from other artists. Today's ease and low cost of
production and distribution have lowered the barriers to entry. Naturally, the market will see an
influx of new entrants. The barriers to success, however, even modest success, are still there.
/phr/a href="http://coolfer.jobamatic.com/a/jbb/job-details/34547" Sony BMG Music Entertainment is
looking for a Mobile Account Executive/adiv class="feedflare" a
href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/coolfer?a=eLrHn"img
src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/coolfer?i=eLrHn" border="0"/img/a a
href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/coolfer?a=qEWhN"img
src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/coolfer?i=qEWhN" border="0"/img/a a
href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/coolfer?a=soklN"img
src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/coolfer?i=soklN" border="0"/img/a /divimg
src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/coolfer/~4/459006562" height="1" width="1"/

|
|
What is Matoumba?
A website that sorts everyday the most relevant information to you.
Vote for the news and Matoumba will learn your tastes and the information that you like the most.
It is all FREE!
|