To display the most relevant entries to you in priority,
vote for the stories you are interested in
(  )
and reject those that you are not interested in
(  )
CiteULike: Borelli's watchlist -
20 hours and 8 minutes ago
iBreast cancer research and treatment, Vol. 109, No. 1. (May 2008), pp. 123-139./ibr /br /Risk
factors for the newly identified "intrinsic" breast cancer subtypes (luminal A, luminal B,
basal-like and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive/estrogen receptor-negative) were
determined in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study, a population-based, case-control study of
African-American and white women. Immunohistochemical markers were used to subtype 1,424 cases of
invasive and in situ breast cancer, and case subtypes were compared to 2,022 controls. Luminal A,
the most common subtype, exhibited risk factors typically reported for breast cancer in previous
studies, including inverse associations for increased parity and younger age at first full-term
pregnancy. Basal-like cases exhibited several associations that were opposite to those observed for
luminal A, including increased risk for parity and younger age at first term full-term pregnancy.
Longer duration breastfeeding, increasing number of children breastfed, and increasing number of
months breastfeeding per child were each associated with reduced risk of basal-like breast cancer,
but not luminal A. Women with multiple live births who did not breastfeed and women who used
medications to suppress lactation were at increased risk of basal-like, but not luminal A, breast
cancer. Elevated waist-hip ratio was associated with increased risk of luminal A in postmenopausal
women, and increased risk of basal-like breast cancer in pre- and postmenopausal women. The
prevalence of basal-like breast cancer was highest among premenopausal African-American women, who
also showed the highest prevalence of basal-like risk factors. Among younger African-American
women, we estimate that up to 68% of basal-like breast cancer could be prevented by promoting
breastfeeding and reducing abdominal adiposity.br /iRC Millikan, B Newman, CK Tse, PG Moorman, K
Conway, LV Smith, MH Labbok, J Geradts, JT Bensen, S Jackson, S Nyante, C Livasy, L Carey, HS Earp,
CM Perou/i

|
CiteULike: Borelli's watchlist -
22 hours and 48 minutes ago
iJournal of mammary gland biology and neoplasia, Vol. 7, No. 1. (January 2002), pp. 3-15./ibr /br
/Ovarian and other hormones are major determinants of breast cancer risk. Particularly important is
the accumulative exposure of the breast to circulating levels of the ovarian hormones estradiol and
progesterone. A number of breast cancer risk factors can be understood in light of how they affect
women's hormone profiles. Age is a marker for the onset and cessation of ovarian activity. Racial
differences in hormone profiles correlate with breast cancer incidence patterns. Age at menarche
not only serves as the chronological indicator of the onset of ovarian activity, but as a predictor
of ovulatory frequency during adolescence and hormone levels in young adults, and has a
long-lasting influence on risk. Age at menopause, another established breast cancer risk factor,
marks the cessation of ovarian activity. Pregnancy history and lactation experience also are
hormonal markers of breast cancer risk. Postmenopausal obesity, which is associated with higher
levels of estrogen following cessation of ovarian activity, increases breast cancer risk, whereas
physical activity, which can limit menstrual function, reduces risk. A relatively recent area of
investigation is prenatal exposures like preeclampsia and low birth weight; both may be associated
with lower in utero exposure to estrogen and also may predict lower breast cancer risk as an adult.
Improved understanding of these exposures and their potential interactions with breast cancer
susceptibility genes may, in the future, improve our prospects for breast cancer prevention.br /iL
Bernstein/i

|
CiteULike: Borelli's watchlist -
22 hours and 50 minutes ago
iClinical breast cancer, Vol. 8, No. 4. (August 2008), pp. 334-342./ibr /br /The perinatal period,
childhood, and adolescence are important intervals for breast cancer risk development. Endogenous
estrogen exposure is thought to be highest in utero, and exposure to estrogens throughout life
plays an important role in increasing breast cancer risk. Some evidence suggests that breast tissue
is not fully differentiated until after the first full-term pregnancy; thus, breast tissue might be
more susceptible to carcinogenic influences during early life and adolescence. Birth
characteristics of the daughter, including gestational age, birth weight, and birth length are
associated with maternal hormone levels during the index pregnancy, and birth size has been related
to daughter's timing of puberty and adult breast cancer incidence. Furthermore, early life and
adolescence are critical times for maturation of the hypothalamic pituitary ovarian axis, which
regulates production of ovarian hormones including estrogen and progesterone. Childhood height,
growth, diet, and body mass index (BMI) have also been associated with breast cancer risk later in
life. Of the examined characteristics, we conclude that the available evidence is suggestive of a
positive relationship of breast cancer risk with birth weight, birth length, and adolescent height,
and an inverse relationship with gestational age and childhood BMI, although several
inconsistencies exist in the literature. The best evidence for a relationship of adolescent diet
and adult breast cancer risk is indirect, and the relationship of diet, weight status, and weight
gain in childhood deserves further attention. The interaction of birth characteristics with
established risk factors over the life course, such as age at menarche, in addition to
gene-environment interactions, require more research. Further study is also needed to clarify the
biologic mechanisms influencing the observed associations.br /iEH Ruder, JF Dorgan, S Kranz, PM
Kris-Etherton, TJ Hartman/i

|
CiteULike: Borelli's watchlist -
1 days ago
iAdvances in experimental medicine and biology, Vol. 630 (2008), pp. 35-51./ibr /br /Cancer is one
of the leading causes of human death and belongs to the group of main chronic noncommunicable
diseases (NCD). Certain specific features ofNCD have raised the concept of 'normal' and
'successful' aging. The apparent paradox of simultaneous increase with aging of the diseases
connected with estrogen deficiency as well as with estrogenic excess can be explained by the
existence of the phenomenon of the switching of estrogen effects. An isolated or combined with the
weakening of hormonal effect increase in genotoxic action of estrogens can modify the course
ofage-associated pathology. In particular, such changes in estrogen effect may alter the biology of
tumors to make them less favorable/more aggressive. Two other endocrine-genotoxic switchings (EGS)
involving phenomena ofJanus (dual) function of glucose and adipogenotoxicosis may produce similar
influences on tumor and other NCD biology. These three phenomena form a'basic triad' and can act
independently of each other or in concert. EGS and their inductors may serve as targets for
prevention and, probably, treatment of main noncommunicable diseases. The measures to correct
components of the 'triad' can be divided into several groups aimed to optimally orchestrate the
balance between endocrine and DNA-damagingeffects of estrogens, glucose and adipose tissue-related
factors.br /iLM Berstein/i

|
CiteULike: Borelli's watchlist -
1 days and 1 hours ago
iJournal of the National Cancer Institute, Vol. 95, No. 16. (20 August 2003), pp. 1218-1226./ibr
/br /BACKGROUND: Obesity is associated with increased breast cancer risk among postmenopausal
women. We examined whether this association could be explained by the relationship of body mass
index (BMI) with serum sex hormone concentrations. METHODS: We analyzed individual data from eight
prospective studies of postmenopausal women. Data on BMI and prediagnostic estradiol levels were
available for 624 case subjects and 1669 control subjects; data on the other sex hormones were
available for fewer subjects. The relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of
breast cancer associated with increasing BMI were estimated by conditional logistic regression on
case-control sets, matched within each study for age and recruitment date, and adjusted for parity.
All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: Breast cancer risk increased with increasing BMI
(P(trend) =.002), and this increase in RR was substantially reduced by adjustment for serum
estrogen concentrations. Adjusting for free estradiol reduced the RR for breast cancer associated
with a 5 kg/m2 increase in BMI from 1.19 (95% CI = 1.05 to 1.34) to 1.02 (95% CI = 0.89 to 1.17).
The increased risk was also substantially reduced after adjusting for other estrogens (total
estradiol, non-sex hormone-binding globulin-bound estradiol, estrone, and estrone sulfate), and
moderately reduced after adjusting for sex hormone-binding globulin, whereas adjustment for the
androgens (androstenedione, dehydroepiandrosterone, dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate, and
testosterone) had little effect on the excess risk. CONCLUSION: The results are compatible with the
hypothesis that the increase in breast cancer risk with increasing BMI among postmenopausal women
is largely the result of the associated increase in estrogens, particularly bioavailable
estradiol.br /iTJ Key, PN Appleby, GK Reeves, A Roddam, JF Dorgan, C Longcope, FZ Stanczyk, HE
Stephenson, RT Falk, R Miller, A Schatzkin, DS Allen, IS Fentiman, TJ Key, DY Wang, M Dowsett, HV
Thomas, SE Hankinson, P Toniolo, A Akhmedkhanov, K Koenig, RE Shore, A Zeleniuch-Jacquotte, F
Berrino, P Muti, A Micheli, V Krogh, S Sieri, V Pala, E Venturelli, G Secreto, E Barrett-Connor, GA
Laughlin, M Kabuto, S Akiba, RG Stevens, K Neriishi, CE Land, JA Cauley, LH Kuller, SR Cummings, KJ
Helzlsouer, AJ Alberg, TL Bush, GW Comstock, GB Gordon, SR Miller, C Longcope, /i

|
CiteULike: Borelli's watchlist -
1 days and 2 hours ago
iCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for
Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, Vol. 11, No. 10 Pt 1.
(October 2002), pp. 953-971./ibr /br /Animal experiments and in vitro studies have shown that
compounds found in tobacco smoke, such as polycyclic hydrocarbons, aromatic amines, and
N-nitrosamines, may induce mammary tumors. The findings of smoking-specific DNA adducts and p53
gene mutations in the breast tissue of smokers also support the biological plausibility of a
positive association between cigarette smoking and breast cancer, as does the detection of
carcinogenic activity in breast fluid. However, epidemiological studies conducted over the past few
decades have variably shown positive, inverse, or null associations. To help reconcile the
discrepant findings, epidemiologists have paid increasing attention to measures of exposure to
tobacco smoke that might be of the greatest etiological importance, to aspects of the smoker that
might modify the association between smoking and breast cancer risk, and to the potentially
different associations that might exist with different types of breast tumors, such as those with
and without estrogen or progesterone receptors. Overall, the results of these studies suggest that
smoking probably does not decrease the risk and indeed suggest that there may be an increased
breast cancer risk with smoking of long duration, smoking before a first full-term pregnancy, and
passive smoking. These findings require confirmation in future studies, as do suggestions of
increased risk among women with certain genotypes.br /iPD Terry, TE Rohan/i

|
CiteULike: Borelli's watchlist -
1 days and 2 hours ago
iThe Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, Vol. 90, No. 3. (March 2005), pp.
1414-1419./ibr /br /Breast cancer risk increases with increased levels of alcohol consumption,
potentially through an effect on sex hormone levels. In a cross-sectional study among Dutch
participants (n = 17,357) of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition
conducted in Utrecht, The Netherlands (Prospect-EPIC), we investigated the relation between alcohol
intake and estrogen and androgen levels. Alcohol intake was calculated from a food frequency
questionnaire. Women were included if they were postmenopausal, had donated a blood sample, and did
not use hormone replacement therapy or oral contraceptives at the time of blood donation (n =
1093). Women who consumed more than 25 g of alcohol per day had higher levels of estrone (P(trend)
= 0.001), estradiol (P(trend) = 0.03), dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (P(trend) = 0.18), and higher
estrone/estradiol (P(trend) = 0.14) and estrone/androstenedione (P(trend) = 0.06) ratios, compared
with nondrinkers. Levels of androstenedione, testosterone, and SHBG did not differ between women
who consumed alcohol and nondrinkers. Furthermore, there were no differences in the free androgen
index or estradiol to testosterone ratio. In conclusion, levels of estrogens and
dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate are higher in women who consume more alcohol. This finding supports
the hypothesis that alcohol use may increase breast cancer risk at least partially through an
effect on sex steroid levels.br /iNC Onland-Moret, PH Peeters, YT van der Schouw, DE Grobbee, CH
van Gils/i

|
CiteULike: Borelli's watchlist -
1 days and 2 hours ago
iInternational journal of cancer. Journal international du cancer, Vol. 122, No. 8. (15 April
2008), pp. 1832-1841./ibr /br /The association between alcohol consumption and an increased risk of
breast cancer has been established. It is still unclear however, whether this relationship differs
across the estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) tumors subtypes. To provide a
quantitative assessment of the association between alcohol intake and the risk of ER-/PR-defined
breast cancer, we conducted a meta-analysis of cohort and case-control studies. Studies were
identified by a literature search of PubMed through April 20, 2007 and by searching the reference
lists of relevant articles. Summarized risk estimates (REs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs)
were calculated using random-effects models. The summarized results of the meta-analysis comparing
the highest versus the lowest consumption categories showed statistically significant higher risks
of developing all ER+ (27%), all ER- (14%), ER+PR+ (22%) and ER+PR- (28%), but not ER-PR- tumors.
The dose-response meta-analysis showed that an increase in alcohol consumption of 10 g of ethanol
per day was associated with statistically significant increased risks for all ER+ (12%), all ER-
(7%), ER+PR+ (11%) and ER+PR- (15%), but not ER-PR-. A statistically significant heterogeneity of
the REs across all ER+ versus ER-PR- was observed (p(heterogeneity) = 0.02). The summarized results
from studies with adjustment for postmenopausal hormone use, body mass index and family history of
breast cancer were higher and statistically significantly different from those without. The
observed positive associations with alcohol for ER+PR+ and ER+PR- tumors cannot be explained by
estrogen-dependent pathway only. Further studies need to clarify the biological mechanisms.br /iR
Suzuki, N Orsini, L Mignone, S Saji, A Wolk/i

|
CiteULike: Borelli's watchlist -
1 days and 4 hours ago
iBreast cancer research : BCR, Vol. 6, No. 4. (2004), pp. 170-178./ibr /br /The role of specific
dietary factors in breast cancer causation is not completely resolved. Results from prospective
studies do not support the concept that fat intake in middle life has a major relation to breast
cancer risk. However, weight gain in middle life contributes substantially to breast cancer risk.
Alcohol is the best established dietary risk factor, probably by increasing endogenous estrogen
levels. Hypotheses relating diet during youth to risk decades later will be difficult to test.
Nevertheless, available evidence is strong that breast cancer risk can be reduced by avoiding
weight gain during adult years, and by limiting alcohol consumption.br /iMD Holmes, WC Willett/i
|
CiteULike: Borelli's watchlist -
1 days and 7 hours ago
iCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for
Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, Vol. 13, No. 1.
(January 2004), pp. 94-101./ibr /br /Women with high circulating estrogen concentrations have an
increased risk of breast cancer; thus, it is important to understand factors, including genetic
variability, that influence estrogen concentrations. Several genetic polymorphisms that may
influence sex hormone concentrations have been identified, including CYP17 (5'-untranslated region
T-->C), CYP19 [intron 4 (TTTA)(n = 7-13) and a 3-bp deletion (-3)], CYP1B1 (Val(432)Leu), and
COMT (Val(108/158)Met). We examined associations between these polymorphisms and serum
concentrations of estrogens, androgens, and sex hormone-binding globulin and urinary concentrations
of 2- and 16alpha-hydroxyestrone in 171 postmenopausal women, using data from the prerandomization
visit of an exercise clinical trial. Participants were sedentary, not taking hormone therapy, and
had a body mass index >24.0. Compared with noncarriers, women carrying two CYP19 7r(-3) alleles
had 26% lower estrone (P < 0.001), 19% lower estradiol (P = 0.01), 23% lower free estradiol (P =
0.01), and 22% higher sex hormone-binding globulin concentrations (P = 0.06). Compared with
noncarriers, women carrying at least one CYP19 8r allele had 20% higher estrone (P = 0.003), 18%
higher estradiol (P = 0.02), and 21% higher free estradiol concentrations (P = 0.01). Women with
the COMT Met/Met genotype had 28% higher 2-hydroxyestrone (P = 0.08) and 31% higher
16alpha-hydroxyestrone concentrations (P = 0.02), compared with Val/Val women. Few associations
were found for CYP17 and CYP1B1 or with serum androgen concentrations. This study provides further
evidence that genetic variation may appreciably alter sex hormone concentrations in postmenopausal
women not taking hormone therapy.br /iSS Tworoger, J Chubak, EJ Aiello, CM Ulrich, C Atkinson, JD
Potter, Y Yasui, PL Stapleton, JW Lampe, FM Farin, FZ Stanczyk, A McTiernan/i

|
CiteULike: Borelli's watchlist -
1 days and 7 hours ago
iInternational journal of cancer. Journal international du cancer, Vol. 102, No. 2. (10 November
2002), pp. 172-178./ibr /br /Reproductive characteristics, alcohol intake and polymorphisms in
genes encoding sex-steroid metabolizing enzymes might influence the risk of hormone-related cancers
by changing circulating concentrations of sex hormones. The relationship between these factors and
serum concentrations of estradiol, progesterone, androstenedione, testosterone and DHEA was
evaluated in a cross-sectional study of 218 pre-menopausal women from Kaiser Permanente Health Plan
in Portland, Oregon. Risk factor information was obtained from questionnaires and hormone serum
concentrations were determined by radioimmunoassays. Genotypes for CYP11A 5'UTR(tttta)n, CYP17
5'-UTR -34 T>C, CYP19 IVS4(ttta)n, CYP1B1 (L432V and S453N) and COMT (V158M) were determined
from genomic DNA samples. Increasing number of full-term pregnancies was associated with a
significant decrease in late-follicular progesterone levels (p-trend = 0.03). Increasing alcohol
consumption was associated with higher estradiol levels averaged through the menstrual cycle
(p-trend = 0.009) and higher progesterone levels during luteal phase (p-trend = 0.04).
Androstenedione and testosterone levels were higher among light to moderate drinkers compared to
non-drinkers, although we only observe a significant trend with increasing levels of alcohol
consumption for androstenedione. Women heterozygous or homozygous for the CYP1B1 L432V or the S453N
polymorphisms had increased luteal estradiol levels (p-value = 0.04 for L432V and 0.04 for S453N).
None of the other factors evaluated was significantly associated with serum concentration of
hormones. In conclusion, results from this cross-sectional study of pre-menopausal women provide
support for an association between light to moderate alcohol intake and elevated levels of estrogen
and androgen levels. Our data suggest that circulating levels of progesterone might be related to
parity and alcohol consumption, however the biological plausibility of the observed associations is
unclear. We found little support for an influence of the evaluated genetic polymorphisms in the
steroid synthesis and metabolism pathway on serum hormone levels, except for a possible effect of
the CYP1B1 L432V and S453N polymorphisms on serum estradiol levels.br /iM García-Closas, J
Herbstman, M Schiffman, A Glass, JF Dorgan/i

|
CiteULike: Borelli's watchlist -
1 days and 7 hours ago
iEndocr Relat Cancer, Vol. 11, No. 3. (September 2004), pp. 497-522./ibr /br /It is widely believed
that ductal breast cancer dissemination involves a succession of clinical and pathological stages
starting with carcinoma in situ, progressing into invasive lesion and culminating in metastatic
disease. Such changes have frequently been attributed to the sequential acquisition of various
alterations in a single cell followed by clonal selection and expansion, thus leading to
intra-tumor diversity. According to this multi-step view, extensive genotype and phenotype (marker
expression, grade) shift may occur in the same tumor during progression; this may lead to the
co-existence of molecularly and/or pathologically different areas within the same lesion. An
increasing amount of data of various natures now appear to challenge this concept: only a few
distinct 'portraits', in relation to estrogen receptor (ER) status and grade, may be found among
tumors. Moreover, although undergoing increasing genetic alteration, most individual lesions
largely maintain their phenotype when they evolve from in situ to the metastatic state. While many
of the data presented here are related to ductal tumors, lobular cancer is also discussed.br /iM
Lacroix, RA Toillon, G Leclercq/i

|
|
What is Matoumba?
A website that sorts everyday the most relevant information to you.
Vote for the news and Matoumba will learn your tastes and the information that you like the most.
It is all FREE!
|