To display the most relevant entries to you in priority,
vote for the stories you are interested in
(  )
and reject those that you are not interested in
(  )
Guardian Unlimited -
1 hours and 36 minutes ago
divimg alt=""
src="http://hits.guardian.co.uk/b/ss/guardiangu-feeds/1/H.15.1/74466?ns=guardianpageName=Society%3A+Devastating+report+reveals+Baby+P+failingsch=Societyc3=The+Guardianc4=Baby+P%2CChild+protection+%28Society%29%2CLocal+government+%28Society%29%2CSociety%2CUK+newsc5=Society+Weekly%2CNot+commercially+useful%2CLocal+Government+Society%2CChildren+Societyc6=John+Carvelc7=2008_12_02c8=1127201c9=articlec10=GUc11=Societyc12=Baby+Pc13=c14=h2=GU%2FSociety%2FBaby+P"
width="1" height="1" //divpThe head of children's services in the London borough where Baby P died
after months of persistent injury and neglect was dismissed from her post yesterday as the
government responded to a damning report into the council's failings./ppOn a day which saw two
senior figures on Haringey council resign within hours of the report hitting ministers' desks, Ed
Balls, the children's secretary, removed Sharon Shoesmith from control of the borough's children's
department. He described the findings of the review as "devastating". /ppThe report, commissioned
at the conclusion of the Old Bailey trial into the toddler's death, found nine fundamental defects,
which continue to put children in danger despite the intense public scrutiny since Baby P was
killed in August last year. They included failure to identify children and young people at risk of
immediate harm, lack of coordination between agencies and poor sharing of information./ppGeorge
Meehan, the council's leader, and Liz Santry, its cabinet member for children and young people,
resigned within hours of reading the conclusions. It is understood that Shoesmith offered to follow
suit and was astonished to see Balls announce her immediate dismissal on live television in the
early afternoon. It also emerged that five other council employees have been suspended over their
handling of the case. /ppBalls said he was using powers under the 1996 Education Act to remove
Shoesmith and install John Coughlin, director of children's services in Hampshire, in her place. "I
have powers to intervene and remove someone who is not fit for office," he told journalists./ppHe
added: "Most people would look at this report - look at the clear evidence of management failures -
and say that this kind of failure should not be rewarded with compensation or payoffs. That's a
matter for Haringey." The council acknowledged that Balls had the authority to remove Shoesmith
from her role as director of children services, but the status of her employment contract with
Haringey was still a matter for the council to resolve./ppA spokesman said: "She has been suspended
pending disciplinary proceedings, with two others: Cecilia Hitchen, deputy director, children and
families; and Clive Preece, head of children in need and safeguarding services." Three other staff
-Maria Ward, the social worker, Sylvia Henry, senior social worker and Gillie Christou, the team
manager - had been removed from child protection duties pending further investigation."/ppThe
council would be required to report monthly to the government on progress in reforming the
children's department, with a further review by Ofsted by the end of June. Balls said he would then
decide whether "further sanction" was needed, including a possible compulsory contracting out of
children's services to another provider./ppBalls said the report by Ofsted, the Healthcare
Commission and chief inspector of constabulary was "devastating and damning". On nearly every page,
the document was littered with words such as "inadequate", "unacceptable", "poor" and "unreliable".
/ppThe failings included:/pp· Failure to identify children and young people at immediate
risk of harm and to act on evidence;/pp· Agencies working in isolation from one another and
without effective coordination;/pp· Poor gathering, recording and sharing of
information;/pp· Inconsistent quality of frontline procedures and insufficient evidence of
supervision by senior management;/pp· Inconsistent management oversight of the assistant
director of children's services by the director of children's services and the chief
executive;/pp· Insufficient challenge by the local Safeguarding Children Board to council
members and frontline staff;/pp· Poor child protection plans./ppBalls ordered the review
after public outcry over the death of the 17-month-old boy, who suffered more than 50 injuries at
the hands of his abusive mother, 27, her boyfriend, 32, and their lodger, Jason Owen, 36, despite
60 contacts with the authorities over eight months. They will be sentenced next year./ppBalls said
he was particularly worried by a finding of the inspectors that child protection staff failed to
talk directly to children. He added: "Where children were not seen alone, it worries me greatly
that the inspectors found little evidence of management follow-up to ensure children suspected of
being abused were properly heard and able to speak up without fear."/ppBalls urged investigations
into 38 other abuse cases to be reopened after Ofsted criticised the quality of previous reviews.
They include three cases in Cornwall, three in Northamptonshire and deaths and serious injuries to
children in Bristol, Derbyshire and Hampshire./ppOfsted will also carry out annual unannounced
inspections in England./ppThere will be a fresh independent review of the Baby P case, with an
executive summary published in March. But the full report will remain confidential and Balls
refused to order a full public inquiry./ppHe accepted advice from Lord Laming, head of the inquiry
into the death of the abuse victim Victoria Climbieacute; in 2000, who said a public inquiry would
set back progress on child protection made in many parts of England and divert effort from the
actions needed to keep children safe in Haringey./pdiv style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;
margin-bottom: 10px;"ullia href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/baby-p"Baby P/a/lilia
href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/childprotection"Child protection/a/lilia
href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/localgovernment"Local government/a/li/ul/diva
href="http://www.guardian.co.uk"guardian.co.uk/a copy; Guardian News Media Limited 2008 | Use of
this content is subject to our a
href="http://users.guardian.co.uk/help/article/0,,933909,00.html"Terms Conditions/a | a
href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/webfeeds/1,,1309488,00.html"More Feeds/a pa
href="http://feedads.googleadservices.com/~at/_nSkxdNX5OGw82lnsfQqEtztgu4/a"img
src="http://feedads.googleadservices.com/~at/_nSkxdNX5OGw82lnsfQqEtztgu4/i" border="0"
ismap="true"/img/a/p

|
Guardian Unlimited -
1 hours and 37 minutes ago
divimg alt=""
src="http://hits.guardian.co.uk/b/ss/guardiangu-feeds/1/H.15.1/24788?ns=guardianpageName=World+news%3A+Sons+of+Mafia+boss+plead+for+private+lifech=World+newsc3=The+Guardianc4=Italy+%28News%29%2CWorld+newsc5=Not+commercially+usefulc6=John+Hooperc7=2008_12_02c8=1127124c9=articlec10=GUc11=World+newsc12=Italyc13=c14=h2=GU%2FWorld+news%2FItaly"
width="1" height="1" //divpThe sons of the Sicilian mafia's jailed "boss of all bosses", Bernardo
Provenzano, yesterday made an emotional appeal for what one called "the right to live like any
other member of the public"./pp"We have lived, and continue to live, as if we were Big Brother
contestants," said Angelo Provenzano. "We have been actors in the biggest reality show on Cosa
Nostra."/ppHe complained bitterly of police surveillance and media pressure. His younger brother,
26 year-old Francesco, said: "Every activity I get ready to set up is scotched because it is
[defined by the law as] a 'product of the laundering of illicitly obtained assets'. I ask myself,
when will I be able to have a life of my own."/ppAs a language and literature graduate, he said he
had won a scholarship to teach Italian in a Germany university. But he added: "They took it away
from me because someone said I could not represent Italy abroad. As if I were the
ambassador."/ppHis elder brother, aged 33, added: "We always try to make ourselves known by our
Christian names, and not by our surname. I always introduce myself as Angelo and only if it is
necessary do I add the rest."/ppThe two young men denied they had been instructed by their father
to give the interview, carried by two Italian dailies, La Repubblica and La Stampa. But police and
prosecutors can be expected to pore over every word in a search for possible coded messages - all
the more so since Angelo Provenzano used the interview to play down the crimes of the mafia. A
spokesman for relatives of the mafia's victims said his declarations of love and respect for his
father were "an insult"./ppBernardo Provenzano was arrested in 2006 after 43 years on the run. His
elder son spent the first 16 years of his life also in hiding. "I was born and brought up in
captivity," said Angelo, who refused to discuss his childhood on the run./ppIn 1992, the boys and
their mother returned to their home town, Corleone, when "my growing-up began", he said. The son of
the "capo di tutti i capi" (boss of all bosses) acknowledged he had found it "difficult" to
integrate with society./ppAt least as difficult was the surveillance to which the family were
subjected after 1992. "They monitored every setting, every space - the living room, the car, the
bathroom, the windows," he said. "Whether they still monitor us, I don't know. We certainly behave
as if we were [under surveillance]."/ppHe suggested that behind the mafia's operations lay
manoeuvres by the authorities, and claimed two of the organisation's most famous victims, the
investigating magistrates Giovanni Falcone and Paolo Borsellino, had been sacrificed "on the altar
of raison d'etat" (national interest)./ppBut he admitted that he had "curbed his curiosity" and had
never asked his mother direct questions about his father. "I concede certain mitigating
circumstances to my father", he said, "so I have nothing to admonish him for."/ppThe brother of a
journalist murdered by the mob said in an open letter to the Provenzano sons: "There is no need to
renounce your father, but [only] to disown his role and condemn decisively his criminal
actions."/pdiv style="float: left; margin-right: 10px; margin-bottom: 10px;"ullia
href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/italy"Italy/a/li/ul/diva
href="http://www.guardian.co.uk"guardian.co.uk/a copy; Guardian News Media Limited 2008 | Use of
this content is subject to our a
href="http://users.guardian.co.uk/help/article/0,,933909,00.html"Terms Conditions/a | a
href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/webfeeds/1,,1309488,00.html"More Feeds/a pa
href="http://feedads.googleadservices.com/~at/WEHbtUzjDeeYgnhXzjchOsUG0G4/a"img
src="http://feedads.googleadservices.com/~at/WEHbtUzjDeeYgnhXzjchOsUG0G4/i" border="0"
ismap="true"/img/a/p

|
Guardian Unlimited -
1 hours and 37 minutes ago
divimg alt=""
src="http://hits.guardian.co.uk/b/ss/guardiangu-feeds/1/H.15.1/29653?ns=guardianpageName=World+news%3A+Israel+blocks+aid+ship+bound+for+Gazach=World+newsc3=The+Guardianc4=Israel+and+the+Palestinian+territories+%28News%29%2CLibya+%28News%29%2CWorld+newsc5=Not+commercially+usefulc6=Rory+McCarthyc7=2008_12_02c8=1127125c9=articlec10=GUc11=World+newsc12=Israel+and+the+Palestinian+territoriesc13=c14=h2=GU%2FWorld+news%2FIsrael+and+the+Palestinian+territories"
width="1" height="1" //divpThe Israeli navy yesterday prevented a Libyan ship carrying 3,000 tonnes
of humanitarian aid for Palestinians from docking in Gaza./ppThe voyage of the Marwa, which carried
food, blankets and powdered milk, was intended to challenge Israel's economic blockade on the Gaza
Strip, which has tightened in recent weeks. But as the ship approached Gazan waters at dawn an
Israeli naval ship ordered it to turn back. The Marwa reportedly docked at al-Arish, an Egyptian
port in the northern Sinai just south of Gaza./ppAn Israeli foreign ministry spokesman, Andy David,
said: "This is a policy we have had for a long time: if somebody wants to bring in humanitarian aid
they can do it through the border with Egypt or the Israeli passages into Gaza."/ppHowever, since
the Palestinian Islamist group Hamas won parliamentary elections nearly three years ago Israel has
imposed ever-tighter restrictions on Gaza. Since last summer, when Hamas took full control of Gaza,
those restrictions have become an economic blockade, while Egypt has also kept its one crossing
into Gaza at Rafah largely closed. As a ceasefire between Israel and Palestinian militant groups in
Gaza has unravelled in the past month, so the blockade has again been tightened. Deliveries of
food, aid and fuel have been prevented on most days and journalists have been barred from
entering./ppPalestinians had gathered at the Gaza City harbour to meet the ship. Five trucks waited
to offload the aid. "The civilian boat carrying only humanitarian supplies and food was turned away
by an Israeli warship," said Jamal Khoudary, a Palestinian MP and head of Gaza's Popular Committee
against the Siege./ppSome reports suggested the aid might be unloaded in Egypt and delivered by
road, although until now Egypt has been reluctant to turn the Rafah crossing with Gaza into a
regular route for deliveries to the impoverished territory./pdiv style="float: left; margin-right:
10px; margin-bottom: 10px;"ullia
href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/israelandthepalestinians"Israel and the Palestinian
territories/a/lilia href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/libya"Libya/a/li/ul/diva
href="http://www.guardian.co.uk"guardian.co.uk/a copy; Guardian News Media Limited 2008 | Use of
this content is subject to our a
href="http://users.guardian.co.uk/help/article/0,,933909,00.html"Terms Conditions/a | a
href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/webfeeds/1,,1309488,00.html"More Feeds/a pa
href="http://feedads.googleadservices.com/~at/27jJgSu6m48U-0SsWiTrlGIRXyQ/a"img
src="http://feedads.googleadservices.com/~at/27jJgSu6m48U-0SsWiTrlGIRXyQ/i" border="0"
ismap="true"/img/a/p

|
MediaShift -
3 hours and 26 minutes ago
Here's a recipe for how to cover local elections. Take a bunch of bright and eager journalism
students. Give them two weeks to fan out across the city and come back with multiplatform stories
on issues as diverse as creating bike-only roads,
spending almost $30
million on a dog pound and treating Vancouver's
sewage.
This is what the first-year students at the Graduate School of Journalism at the University of
British Columbia did for their final big assignment of the semester. The stories were published a
few days ahead of Vancouver's local elections on November 15 on our student publication, TheThunderbird.ca.
Following the Election
Election news is one of the main staples of journalism, so having a vote on our own doorstep
provided a great learning opportunity for the class. For this assignment, the students each had
to find, research, report and produce a news story.
But they also have to come up with a sidebar that would complement their main piece, and consider
what format this should take. This reflects our multiplatform approach in training graduate
students to work across different media while at the same time maintaining quality content. We
all know what a challenge that can be, even in the newsroom.
Many of the students are comfortable with technology and eager to experiment. But this is not
just about adding video or audio to a story because you can. Students are taught to consider how
using multimedia can enhance their journalism, making critical decisions about why one form of
media works better than another to tell a particular story.
When student Alexis Stoymenoff wrote about the mayoral candidates singing at an event, she also
posted short clips of
the performances. The videos enhanced the written piece by allowing readers to see what the
story was all about.
Another, Brandi Cowen, looked at how students new to the city were excluded from the local poll,
producing a map showing different
voting rules across Canada. This provided an easy and intuitive way to examine what could
have been a rather dry written piece.
Unraveling City Politics
Despite all the new ways to inform readers about civic issues, some basics remain. Students can't
forget that, no matter what tools you use to tell a story, the most important thing is to do the
legwork to make sure that the underlying story is accurate. The students still had to research
the local political scene, a task especially daunting given that many of them are from outside
Vancouver and have only been living in the city for a few months.
Getting a grounding in local politics was key to this assignment, as this West Coast city has its
own peculiarities. National parties aren't represented on a local level. Instead there are
Vancouver-only parties. And local councilors are not elected according to city district. Rather,
the ten candidates with the most votes overall are elected.
Therefore it was important to have faculty on hand who could help guide the students.
Fortunately, our Canwest Visiting
Professor for this semester is Vancouver Sun columnist Miro Cernetig. As a regular
commentator on city politics, he brought considerable knowledge and connections to the classroom.
He was instrumental in persuading the premier of British Columbia, Gordon Campbell, to talk to
the students about the political
issues in the province.
Still, it proved hard for students to gain, in just a few weeks, the sort of understanding of
local politics that a city reporter develops over years. Our advice was simple: Keep asking
questions. Sometimes the hardest part of being a journalist is admitting that they don't know
something, or don't quite understand it.
As budding reporters, it is understandable that a student might be concerned about appearing
ignorant. But there is nothing wrong in pressing for a clearer explanation and asking for more
details. Curiosity and perseverance pay off in the end.
Less is More
In the end, the students learned that not every story needed a multiplatform approach. Learning
how to use multimedia to successfully tell a story sometimes involves learning when not to use
multimedia. It's not about adding audio or video just because you can.
One challenge the students faced was working on stories that were not going to be published for a
couple of weeks. Many started their newsgathering by attending debates between candidates or
election-related events in communities. But the spot news generated by these events would be
woefully out of date by our publication deadline. Instead, we urged the students to look at the
issues that can come out of these events, and find the stories that brought the topic to life in
a topical and relevant fashion.
Our aim was for the students to produce local stories on issues that were largely absent from the
day-to-day coverage of the campaign in the mainstream media.
As a result, we ended up with a wealth of content. For example, at one of the mayoral debates,
neither candidate was willing to commit funds to the Outgames due to be held in Vancouver in
2011, at a time when the city was spending millions on the 2010 Winter Olympics.
Student Magally Zelaya used that as the starting point to look at the reaction
from Vancouver's gay community, which prides itself on its economic and cultural significance
to the city. For this story, we decided that the most effective way to enhance the main story was
a Q&A on the Outgames,
rather than try to use multimedia just for the sake of it.
Another, Brent Wittmeier, reported on the debate over building
homes in church parking lots and also chose text for the sidebar. Even in a multimedia
medium like the web, sometimes plain old text may be the best way to enhance a story.
For the students, the local elections offered an opportunity to take their skills out of the
classroom and apply them in a professional setting. It gave them a grounding in the politics of
the city and a way to showcase their multiplatform journalism. But it was also about making
decisions about using multimedia and thinking critically about how best to tell the story.
Alfred Hermida is an online news pioneer and journalism educator. He is an assistant
professor at the Graduate School of Journalism, the University of British Columbia, where he
leads the integrated journalism program. He was a founding news editor of the BBC News website.
He blogs at Reportr.net.
This is a summary.
Visit our site for the full post ».

|
Mashable! -
5 hours and 34 minutes ago
Chris Snyder
is an online journalist specializing in new media. He writes about the tech biz for Wired.com’s Epicenter
blog.
It’s a long road to a victory in the browser wars. Just ask Firefox. The open source browser
which launched in 2004 just cracked the 20 percent threshold of the market share for November,
according to Net Applications, pushing it a step closer but still miles away from IE.
Recently a few new players have also thrown their hats in the ring, including Google with its
much-hyped Chrome and the lesser
known, Mozilla-based social web browser Flock,
which released its 2.0 version this past
October. But do these newcomers even stand a chance?
The Basics
Firefox is gaining ground for good reason: it’s simple, reliable and secure. Its tabbed
browsing led to a similar remodel in IE and it has a slew of add-ons that give it a leg up over
the competition. It’s slowly becoming the new standard with a steady audience, and that
will be hard to beat anytime soon. And its open source platform leaves room for alternatives and
experimental niche browsers like Flock.
Flock 2.0 is basically a Firefox with a lot of perks and pre-installed add-ons for those heavy
into social networking. Think of it as a FriendFeed of the browser world, which brings all of your friends from 23 various
networks together in a sidebar. It is also one of the first browsers to incorporate media feeds
for photos and videos. Flock is all about sharing what you find on the web as you
surf, and it allows you to accomplish this pretty easily by dragging and dropping them either
into an email or onto a friend.
Chrome is the polar opposite of Flock, and its big advantage is that it’s even simpler than
Firefox, or any other browser out there right now. The search bar is also integrated
into the address bar, which seems to be the wave of the future, at least for those who swear by
Google search and don’t need any bells and whistles. Unfortunately,
Chrome’s only available for PCs at the moment.
Usability
Chrome wins hands down on getting the job done. It’s quick and painless with a
clear focus of searching for information using Google’s engine. Dynamic tabbed
browsing is a staple now, and if anything crashes, only that tab will go down, not your entire
session, which is nice. But if you want a richer web browsing experience stick with Firefox or
Flock. There’s also no easy way to subscribe to RSS feeds from the search bar
as there is with Firefox.
Flock can feel a bit overwhelming at times with all of the sidebars of information, but once you
get everything set up and get the hang of it, it’s pretty convenient and preferable to
keeping a million tabs open for sites like Twitter and Facebook. The drag and drop interface
is great. When you just want to email a YouTube video or picture it’s much
easier than copying any URLs, although it does also seem a bit too easy to share something that
you might not want shared.
The only other problem with the social networks is that you can’t really fit all of that
functionality into a sidebar. It’s a good way of consolidating friends, but
it’s more like a giant address book than anything else. Simple things like posting tweets
are a bit confusing, with no clear box for entering in text. When a friend adds content, however,
it will open up the profile in the main browser in full view, so you still need to go back to the
source.
Speed
Despite the extra features, Flock is surprisingly just as fast as Chrome or Firefox, at least on
a medium grade PC. Looks like they’ve improved upon this concern in the latest
release. And Chrome seems to have Firefox beat in this category but the difference isn’t
anything drastic.
Privacy
Incognito — aka “porn mode” –Â is the new way to surf, as
every browser is picking up on this private surfing option that the new IE first initiated.
Chrome has faced some privacy concerns at launch with its Omnibox monitoring and recording too much
information, but this can all be prevented by changing the default settings and going Incognito.
Expandability
Chrome doesn’t support any extensions or add-ons yet, so Firefox still dominates in this
area. But if you are looking for simple, you probably don’t want much more
than Chrome already offers.
Final Thoughts
Firefox is here to stay, but there will always be a long tail of niche alternatives like Chrome
and Flock. When Chrome moves into Mac realm it could pick up some market share from
Safari. Flock will be there for social network junkies who want to try something
new, but the first step to making Flock mainstream will be for more of the social networks
themselves to go mainstream. Twitter is on track, but still has a long way to go before
it’s a household name. If you’re only on Facebook or MySpace, you probably
don’t need to worry about the extra sidebars and features.
---
Related Articles at Mashable | All That's New on the Web:
Flock Gets a New
Boss, Flock 1.0 Coming
Flock Public Beta Now Live
How Can Flock’s Social Browser Play
Into the “Open” Movement?
Flock’s Social Browser 1.0 Has Finally
Arrived
More is More: Flock 2.0
Flock CEO Jumps Ship
Anxious About Private Browsing
in Firefox? Try the Latest Build


|
Global Voices Online -
7 hours and 13 minutes ago
African bloggers are highlighting water related issues, from the politics in South Africa that
led to suspension of a water quality expert, new devices for collecting and cleaning water, to
the 'scramble for fish' the East African lake region.

CC licenced photo by Julien
Harneis on flickr.
We start with South Africa where the blog Urbansprout highlights the
suspension Dr. Anthony Turton . Dr Turton is a researcher who was set to deliver a
presentation at the conference “Science Real and Relevant” in Pretoria. He was barred
from delivering the presentation, and later suspended by The Council for Scientific and
Industrial Research (CSIR).
The blogger includes the presumed reason for his suspension as communicated by the CSIR, but also
looks at the content of Dr. Turton's
paper[pdf on environment.co.za], noting…
Taking a brief look at Dr Turton's paper, he argues that a lack of investment in science,
engineering and technology (SET) since the early 1990's, the termination of important research
projects and the shift to a contract driven income model has had a “catastrophic
effect” on our national scientific capacity to deal with the technical challenges our water
quality is facing.
There is also the question of academic freedom of scientists to present their findings.
Urbansprout quotes a science journalist reacting to news of Dr. Turton's suspension.
Science journalist and former Journalism head of department of the University of Stellenbosch, Dr
George Claassen asserted that the withdrawal of the presentation by the CSIR was an
“absolute disgrace”. “This is a very serious encroachment on academic freedom
and the right of scientists to announce their results, no matter how bad those results are for
our view of things,” he commented. Claassen noted that academic and research freedom was
protected under Section 16 of the constitution, which states that everyone has the right to
freedom of expression, including academic freedom and freedom of scientific research.
Urbansprout provides the link for an online petition
in support of Dr. Turton and concludes:
Turton's report highlighted that South Africa could be headed for a water supply and water
quality crisis that could negatively impact on the economic growth and development of the
country, as well as lead to social unrest. The findings conflicted starkly with recent government
assurances that South Africa was not facing a water crisis similar to the one prevailing in the
electricity-supply sector.
A previous post
on Urbansprout gives more information about the water crisis in South Africa, which is
characterized by sewage seeping from municipal treatment works to rivers. The water from the
rivers feeds into the local tap water system.
A WaterMill is described on the
BLDG blog as a device that “uses the electricity of about three light bulbs to condense
moisture from the air and purify it into clean drinking water.” Rory of The
Carbon Smart
blog links to the BLDG
post, and considers ‘micro devices' like the WaterMill, and whether this could be a
source of clean drinking water for urban areas. He writes:
Discussion about the
WaterMill — a small-scale dehumidifier that collects and cleans water from the air
— leads to conjecture not only about how much of our drinking water could come from the
air, but also about whether the urban microclimate could be significantly altered by installing
thousands of these low-energy devices. Could we do away with a significant number of
energy-sapping air conditioners by making our environment more comfortable through a combination
of better building design, appropriate clothing, vegetating the landscape and reducing the
ambient humidity with thousands of WaterMills?
In East Africa, the Kenyan blog
Kenvironews highlights a piece by Namhla Matshanda of the African Security Analysis
Programme. The piece looks at the conflict over Migingo island in Lake Victoria, which is claimed by both Uganda
and Kenya. The piece warns:
The so-called ‘scramble for fish’ in Lake Victoria is turning out to be
a source of conflict between nations bordering the lake and could potentially threaten regional
stability. In the past month alone there have been several incidents around the lake that have
heightened tensions between Uganda, Tanzania and Kenya. It is now apparent that the main source
of these incidents is the lack of a clearly delimited and demarcated border between the three
countries sharing Lake Victoria.
Since 2003, a number of Kenyan fishermen have been arrested and their boats and equipment
confiscated by either Tanzanian or Ugandan authorities for “illegally crossing the common
borders.” The latest incident happened when about 400 Kenyan fishermen were kicked out of
Migingo island by Ugandan authorities. Migingo is claimed by both Uganda and Kenya. This incident
has exacerbated the already strained relations between the two countries. The Kenyan fishermen
have appealed to their political leaders to intervene, some even threatening violence.

|
SimonWaldman.net -
9 hours and 48 minutes ago
Â
I was asked recently to speak at the Campaign/ APG Battle of Big Thinking.
A few publisher types such as myself were tagged on at the end of a day of agency planners
pontifications on life, the universe and everything (there was a lot of quantum physics, for some
reason). Anyway, this was my contribution. It wasn’t quite in tune with the day - but it
went down OK, I think..Some of the stats/info might be out of date. Also - I snaffled lots of the
photos in a hurry not thinking about using them online. If anyone has a problem with their use -
please contact me.
There is no shortage of reasons to be utterly miserable at the moment in the media world. But, I
have been plagued with wreckless optimisim – so I’m here to give you
something very rare - a good news story from a media owner..
I believe that if for one second we can look up from, the short term pain we are feeling, and
take a broader look at the health of the media industry, we are in a golden era.
We are living in the era of the Great British Media Brand.
I believe this is happening because of a combination of British creativity, the opportunities
thrown open by the internet, an increasingly global cultural marketplace –
and, of course, the gift of the English language..
And, I believe this is good for consumers. Good for advertisers. And good for the economy as a
whole.
I want to start with Matt Damon. In the Bourne Ultimatum. Here he is on the Eurostar, and guess
what, he’s reading a copy of the Guardian he bought at Gard Du Nord.

What is he reading you might ask? Is it Polly Toynbee on social policy? Is it Charlie Brooker on
why Apple Macs are really Fisher Price computers? Or Hadley Freeman on the fashion pages on
whether it’s ok for middle aged men to keep their shirts untucked? [quick answer
– no because everyone knows what you’re trying to hide].
No – he is reading none of this. He is a ruthless assassin with a heart of
gold and not much interest in fashion, gadgets or the state of the nation’s poorly paid.
He’s readings story about him, Jason Bourne.
Soon he’ll arrive in London and call a Guardian journalist. You’ll see a shot of our
offices. You’ll see a bespectacled editor who looks spookily like Alan Rusbridger.
You’ll see our intrepid journalist go off to meet him at Waterloo. Unfortunately he gets
killed, while Matt Damon gets away – which is a shame – and
possibly not how our PR department might have written the script – but it
makes for a much better film than if Matt Damon had got shot and you have to follow the exciting
escapades of a Guardian journalist for the next two hours.
And the remarkable thing about this – is that the Guardian is featured at all.
Ten years ago, for an American blockbuster, they would either have used the Times
‘Of London’; or created a fictional title – The
Bugle, or The Daily Beast.
And why has this happened? Entirely because of the internet. It is only because of the internet
that our brand means anything to anyone outside the UK – certainly anyone
under 50 – and because of that, they can include the brand because it fits
with the story. Even those who have never seen the paper, or perhaps even the website will be
aware that this is just the sort of story the Guardian would break.
The truth is that in the national press, a set of titles forged in a phenomenally competitive
domestic market, are finding themselves with significant international followings as they forge
ahead online.
Over the last year, we have seen the Daily Mail dramatically increase it’s international
audience – due perhaps to such insightful investigations as this gem I found
on the site today :

“Has ex Blue peter presenter Zoe Salomon used sticky-back plastic to protect her
modesty”. Which features no less than three photos just to help us get to grips with this
tricky issue.
And by sparking off such comments as – and I quote directly: “ So
what has she achieved by wearing such revealing clothes? Imagine her father looking at those
pics…..? Will he be proud by looking at her assets? Of course not!” Tops,
London, 5/11/2008 16:54
And..
“I think she looks gorgeous, but then here in Australia we can recognise class when we
see it!” Bruce McDonald, Melbourne, Australia.
OK – so maybe I’m not the greatest fan of the Mail, but they, errr,
certainly seem to know how to keep their audience happy.
But the global audiences of all the national press combined are dwarfed by the BBC, who now have
a weekly global news audience – on TV as well as online - of 233 million.
Now, like many commercial media owners, I have plenty to complain about with the BBC
– but, you cannot deny their global achievement around news in the last decade
has been spectacular.
They are perhaps the greatest British Media Brand of all - what’s important in
this context, is that it didn’t have to be this way. They could have spent the last decade
bumbling along in White City with their greatest innovation being a new version of the Generation
game – instead, they have become a global creative powerhouse.
There is a similar revolution happening in Magazines – but here it’s
more about licensing. Here is Caroline’s boss – Lord Heseltine on the
Haymarket site, talking about the increasingly global reach of his brands. I will spare you the
full video for the moment – but you can see..

Autotrader in South Korea. F1 Racing in Singapore. FourFourTwo in Nigeria. Stuff magazine in
Morocco. [can you believe that – Stuff in Morocco?] WhatCar website in
Latvia...
Conceived in Britain. Consumed around the world.
In a different medium, but a similar vein – we are world leaders in the TV
formats. According to the latest estimates we have around 40% of the market –
way ahead of our nearest rivals – the US and Holland.
Pop Idol, The Weakest Link and, unbelievably, Wife Swap have all been round the world
– remade in dozens of countries.
The Office, as you’ll know has been both sold around the world – and
remade. As you can see here – in Germany, France, Canada and the US.
I like to think that the internet played a role in the Office’s global success
– as you know he holds the Guiness World Record for the most popular
podcasts – and these started initially with the Guardian. Ah yes
– Ricky Gervais, he’d be nowhere without us. But,
strangely, you never hear him say thank you!
The current best seller – perhaps the fastest grower of all is the
‘Got Talent’ format – which is everywhere. This is
the website of the Belgian version – which, I think you’ll agree, looks
like a must-watch.

And even comparatively old formats continue to find new markets. You might have noticed earlier
this month that Who Wants to Be a Millionaire is now being launched in Afghanistan
– albeit with a total prize of around £12,000...
All of this points to one of our great strengths as a national media industry
– we are a formidable creative hot house for media brands, and we are also
very good at exploiting them...
We are helped by working in the English language – but, trust me, you
couldn’t give the same presentation about Australia, Canada or New Zealand..
But this goes beyond simply licensing and redistributing. Like all great brands, Great British
media brands are brilliant at evolving. This goes beyond simply chosing which platform to operate
on.
If you were in LA last night, you could have gone to the weekly NME club night, which follows on
from the NME Awards that were held in the same city in April.

The NME has broken out of a petty local scrap with other British music mags onto a broader stage
– bringing in both the net, and live events.
And if you fancy a podcast – you will notice that the Economist now creates
the sixth most popular podcast on iTunes US. That’s the sixth – in
total. Ahead of everything. Bigger than BBC World News. Bigger even than Jamie Oliver. Who, while
we’re at it is another Great British Media Brand!
The Economist has been a phenomenal flag-flier for the UK – a premium product
that has continued to grow in the US, while Time and Newsweek get slimmer and slimmer.The
production qualities on its podcast are frankly less then wonderful, but the core ideas and the
quality of insight more than make up for it.
The internet too has enabled some of our more ambitious cultural brands to start to become real
media brands. Tate is my favourite example.
Tate Modern is the most visited museum of modern art in the world – with
around 5m annual visitors, that is about twice the annual visitors of the Museum of Modern Art in
New York.
Every week, hundreds of thousands of people pour into it -Â engaging not just with
the brilliant art inside, but also with Tate – which has had the foresight to
build on this, and if you speak to their marketing director, Will Gompertz –
he’ll you how they increasingly see themselves as a media company.
They create their own video – to further the knowledge and
understanding of art – around the world. And they do rather nicely in
sponsorship as a result.
I would put Tate near the the top of my ‘media brands to watch’ over the
next five years.
I think the learning from Tate –and from my next example, is that we know how
to keep pushing our media brands forward. To keep them evolving.
Enter Daniel Craig, and James Bond – perhaps the most valuable British media
brand of all. Recently re-invented and revamped.
I can’t really add anything to the screeds that have been written about this
– other than to point out, just how remarkable it is to have kept this
franchise alive and relevant for over 30 years. It is the most formidable act of media brand
management.
The ingenuity goes beyond the films to the books – where the originals have
been reworked. On the left is the original cover for Casino Royale. In the middle is the 2006
retro edition, and on the right, it’s the Penguin Classics version –
ideal for A Level English Literature. Or, more likely media studies.

But this is mere re-packaging, much smarter has been the introduction of the young Bond books by
Charlie Higson, and getting Sebastian Faulks to follow on from Ian Flemming with the release
earlier this year of Devil May Care – in both cases, bringing Bond to new
audiences..
As we broaden our cultural horizons again – we can see our cultural influence
contining to grow. We have a pretty healthy crop of artists in the US top 50 –
and fortunately, Simon Cowell is only responsible for one of them.
But, the real example of someone rising from being merely a star to a
‘brand’ has to be Amy Winehouse – the only living
popstar (other than Michael Jackson in his Thriller outfit) who has become a staple for Halloween
Fancy Dress.

So that is the end of my whistle stop tour. What, you might ask, makes a Great British Media
Brand?
There are three things I think are often important.
Brand history helps. If only because it means that when people come to work at the BBC, or the
Guardian or the Economist, or the NME – they have more than likely grown up
with it; the understand it as a consumer and they are committed to taking it forward, and make it
relevant for their word.
At the same time – I should add history can hold you back, if you allow it to.
Tate could easily decide it was just a gallery. But it wouldn’t be the same organisation.
Being great on the web helps – not just in terms of distribution and
publishing, but in using it as a tool to engage with your audience – and
vitally to let them engage with each others.
I should stress that online is not the end game – but it is the easiest way
for a media brand to realise it can be more than a local publication.
And finally – success breeds success. The more things people get right, the
more they keep getting right. Simon Cowell (unfortunately some might say) is the perfect example
of that. So is the BBC, but then so again is the Tate, Haymarket’s licensing programme and
the Economist’s podcasts.
If this was just a bit of trumpet blowing – I could stop now. But
it’s a little bit more important that that.
This is not just some triumphal jingoisim And, if you this is not a rehashing of
‘Cool Britannia’ – because, let’s face it,
there isn’t much that is cool about Belgium’s got talent.
Actually, this is just about survival.
The world is getting smaller – so we have a chance to get bigger. Not only
that, but as our economy is slowing down – so we need to look overseas for
growth.
To abuse a quote from Woody Allen –: ‘Brands
are like sharks, they need to keep moving in order to stay alive’ – and
for media brands, that means the constant exploration of new platforms, new ideas and new
territories.
Above all – thinking internationally, thinking globally, makes you better.
From our point of view, you pay much more attention to what you say about the world, when you
know the world is watching you and more than willing to pick you up when you get something wrong.
I make this point repeatedly when people ask me if we’re making any money from our
international audience. Or, if they have a particularly poor grasp of the Englsh
language if we’re ‘monetising those eyeballs’.
As important as our immediate revenue figures are – there is much more at
stake in the long term.
Not everything is going to work – creatively or commercially. But the
alternative – sticking to what you’ve always known, and what
you’ve always done is perhaps the greatest failure of all. Fortunately, I think that is
hard coded into the DNA of the media brands I’ve talked about today.
And if it is essential for us as media owners, it is also essential for advertisers.
Strong brands, with engaged audiences make the best advertising environment. None of us can claim
exclusive access to an audience any more – there are too many alternatives. As
a result, we have to compete not just on the scale of our audience, but the depth of our
relationship with them – ideally on as many different levels as possible.
And, on a broader scale – the economy needs us. We hardly manufacture anything
any more. And now that the financial services sector are either on their knees
or  owned by the state – the creative industries are
frankly the best hope any government has of a good news story.
So – I want to go back to where I started. I believe that right here, right
now – it is time for us to get behind the Great British Media Brands in our
midst.
The alternative is just too teeny to contemplate.

|
Guardian Unlimited -
10 hours and 8 minutes ago
divimg alt=""
src="http://hits.guardian.co.uk/b/ss/guardiangu-feeds/1/H.15.1/22822?ns=guardianpageName=Politics%3A+Damian+Green+civil+servant+press+conference+-+livech=Politicsc3=guardian.co.ukc4=Damian+Green%2CPolitics%2CWhitehall%2CPolice+%28politics%29%2CConservatives%2CUK+newsc5=Policy+Society%2CNot+commercially+useful%2CUnclassifed+Contributorsc6=Andrew+Sparrowc7=2008_12_01c8=1126980c9=articlec10=GUc11=Politicsc12=blogc13=c14=Politics+blogh2=GU%2FPolitics%2Fblog%2FPolitics+blog"
width="1" height="1" //divpChristopher Galley, the civil servant at the centre of the leak inquiry
that led to the arrest of Tory frontbencher Damian Green, will hold a press conference at 4.30pm,
his lawyers said. More soon .../ppstrong3.45pm: /strongThe Home Office "mole" alleged to have
leaked sensitive documents to Green is to speak publicly for the first time today. Galley will hold
a press conference in central London at 4.30pm, his lawyers Bindmans said./ppGalley, 26, was
arrested earlier this month by police investigating a series of leaks from the
department./ppControversy erupted last Thursday when Green was also arrested in connection with the
inquiry. The shadow immigration minister was questioned for nine hours, and had his Commons office
and constituency home searched before being released./ppstrong3.50pm: /strongJust when everyone at
Westminster was wondering where the Green story was heading, we heard that Galley would be giving a
press conference. /ppApparently Galley won't be talking himself, but his lawyer, Neil O'May, head
of the criminal department at Bindmans, will be making a statement and taking questions. We don't
know yet what he's going to say./ppThis comes on a day when a
href="http://www.guprod.gnl/politics/2008/dec/01/damian-green-jacqui-smith"the Tories have been
stepping up their attack on Jacqui Smith/a over her handling of the affair./ppstrong4pm:
/strongWhether by coincidence or not, the Tories have just been briefing journalists in the Commons
about Green's relationship with Galley. They first met in May 2006, apparently, when Galley
approached the Tories because he was concerned about aspects of the government's immigration
policy. On that occasion the two men met in Westminster. It was not until several months later,
towards the end of 2006, that Galley applied for a job with Green. He was turned down without an
interview. That was before the first of the four leaks that the Tories have acknowledged took
place./ppstrong4.10pm: /strong The Home Office has said that the investigation it ordered involves
20 leaks. The Tories say that figure is a "complete exaggeration"./ppIt seems that other Tories may
have had dealings with Galley, but party sources say that Green was their "main contact" with the
civil servant. We don't know yet the full extent of their involvement, but the Tories say that over
two years the only hospitality that Galley has had from the party is one
drink./ppstrong4.30pm:/strong O'May outlines Galley's dealing with Green. He says: "If ever there
was a case of don't shoot the messenger", this was it./ppstrong4.35pm:/strong O'May also says he
wants to address the allegations that have been aired in the press about Galley being used to
entrap Green. It has been claimed that Galley called Green after Galley had been arrested (he was
arrested, but released without charge) and that Green thought this was an attempt to implicate him.
O'May says these allegations are untrue and malicious./ppThen he says he can't take any questions
and that he and Galley have to leave. But he indicates that he's coming back later to speak to
journalists. I'm monitoring from Sky and News 24, and they've moved on now, but a colleague is at
Bindmans and I'll let you know as soon as I hear more./ppIn a moment I'll put up a more detailed
account of O'May's statement./ppstrong4.40pm:/strong O'May is back. He says there were a series of
contacts between Galley and Green. Asked if the release of information was "systematic", he
declines to accept that word - but he says that information was handed over on a regular basis.
Asked if Galley would plead guilty or not guilty if he were charged, he says it's too early to say.
/ppAnd I'm afraid I've lost the live feed now. Sky and News 24 have decided that Haringey's press
conference on Baby P is more important./pdiv style="float: left; margin-right: 10px; margin-bottom:
10px;"ullia href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/damian-green"Damian Green/a/lilia
href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/whitehall"Whitehall/a/lilia
href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/police"Police/a/lilia
href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/conservatives"Conservatives/a/li/ul/diva
href="http://www.guardian.co.uk"guardian.co.uk/a copy; Guardian News Media Limited 2008 | Use of
this content is subject to our a
href="http://users.guardian.co.uk/help/article/0,,933909,00.html"Terms Conditions/a | a
href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/webfeeds/1,,1309488,00.html"More Feeds/a pa
href="http://feedads.googleadservices.com/~at/iSAAVfes5-bF_kHkuCZwiwPHF9E/a"img
src="http://feedads.googleadservices.com/~at/iSAAVfes5-bF_kHkuCZwiwPHF9E/i" border="0"
ismap="true"/img/a/p

|
Mashable! -
11 hours and 50 minutes ago
The Huffington Post has raised 25 million
dollars in funding from Oak Investment
Partners, claims ATD.
According to ATD, this puts the valuation for The Huffington Post at 100 million dollar.
It’s a big valuation, and the 25 million dollar round is bigger than the previously rumored
15 million. A question that inevitably still pops up after any news such as this is:
“how does this make sense? It’s just a blog!” I, however, don’t
see why not.
I’ve checked out Huffington Post - which I
rarely normally do as I’m not interested in politics - and I don’t see any crucial
differences between this site, and any big media publication on the web. They’ve got news,
reports, features, they seem to be timely and thorough, and they produce a lot of content. On the
internet, that’s pretty much all that matters: whether you’ve got a team of 100
people behind the site or it’s just a one man gig, all your readers care about is the
content.
The only difference between a blog and any other media publication is that blogs scale very well.
Traditionally, if you want to start a newspaper, you need editors, journalists, graphic
designers, you need money for print, you need marketing, and a zillion other things just
to start off. And it all costs a lot of money.
On a blog, starting out is not only cheap: it’s free. You just start
writing. If you’re good, then you get audience, and you can add all those things mentioned
above as you go along. However, this doesn’t at all mean that a blog cannot be bigger than
the New York Times: there’s absolutely no reason why it couldn’t. And one day,
it’ll happen. In fact, blogs usually understand the new media better than old giants.
Valuating The Huffington Post at $100 million may be brave, but it’s definitely not insane;
we’ll see if this particular bet pays off.
---
Related Articles at Mashable | All That's New on the Web:
Blogging’s 10th Birthday: Are We
Journalists Yet?
Are 33% of Blogs Really
Splogs?
Grokking OPML
The New York Times to
Acquire Freakanomics Blog, and More
Blogs are Going to the Olympics
Six Apart Launches Blogs.com
to Promote You — Maybe
BlogCatalog Gets Socially Networked


|
Silicon Alley Insider -
13 hours and 10 minutes ago
pimg class="float_right" src="/~~/f?id=48454b3414b9b9400027139amaxX=370maxY=278" border="0"
alt="betsymorgan.jpg" title="betsymorgan.jpg" width="370" height="278" /Huffington Post a
href="http://kara.allthingsd.com/20081201/huffington-post-nabs-25-million-in-funding-heres-an-exclusive-boomtown-interview-with-oak-investments-fred-harman/"raises
$25 million from Oak,/a $10 million more than previously reported. Kara Swisher puts the valuation
at just south of $100 million (presumably post-money)./p pThis is a lot of money and a good (if not
great) valuation. The company is smart to raise this much now, given the collapse of the global
economy. The New York Times could use a similar infusion./p pKara's quote from Oak's Fred Harman:/p
p style="padding-left: 30px;""There is an inevitable shift from offline to online with people
increasingly getting their news media online, and this election proved how powerful the Huffington
Post could be,' said Harman (pictured here), in an interview with BoomTown. 'And I think the
post-election perception of the Huffington Post has changed in the eyes of advertisers to being a
key mainstream news site.'/p pemThe Huffington Post Announces $25 Million In Funding From Oak
Investment Partners/em/p pemNew York, NY (December 1, 2008)-The Huffington Post, a leading news and
opinion site, today announced that it has secured $25 million in funding from Oak Investment
Partners, a venture capital firm based in Palo Alto, California. The Huffington Post ('HuffPost')
will use the proceeds to invest in the growth of the company and for select and focused
acquisitions. The company said it would invest in its technology and infrastructure, increase its
in-house advertising capabilities, and continue to expand its content offerings-including a new
investigative journalism initiative and a rollout of local versions of The Huffington Post in
select cities. The announcement was made by Arianna Huffington and Kenneth Lerer, co-founders of
The Huffington Post./em/p pem'This commitment from Oak Investment Partners will allow us to
accelerate our growth, with more verticals, more video, more citizen journalism initiatives, more
cities for our local editions, and a fund for investigative journalism,' said Arianna Huffington.
'We are particularly excited to have Fred Harman of Oak join our board; his deep knowledge of the
new media landscape will help us to take HuffPost to the next level.'/em/p pemSaid Kenneth Lerer:
'We are thrilled to bring on board a partner like Oak to work with Softbank Capital and Greycroft
as we move forward. Since launching the site three and half years ago, the company has built a
strong brand and an audience of millions who rely on the site for its mix of smart news and
opinion. The additional capital from Oak will enable us to go full-steam ahead with operations and
select acquisitions.'/em/p pemFred Harman, general partner at Oak Investment Partners, said, 'Much
of the news media business needs to be reassembled online around an ad-supported model and the
timetable for this has been accelerated, not slowed, by this economic down cycle. We believe that
The Huffington Post has built a platform and business model to be among the leaders in aggregating
this audience online. Our financing will provide the resources necessary to scale the company, both
organically as well as through acquisitions of additional talent and new media companies. We are
also very excited to have the opportunity to back Arianna and the company's strong entrepreneurial
team.'/em/p pemBetsy Morgan, CEO of The Huffington Post, said, 'With funding from Oak, The
Huffington Post is perfectly positioned to build on its incredible growth. Oak brings to the table
a team with enormous experience and insight, and we look forward to working with them to seize the
opportunities ahead of us.'/em/p pemThe Series C financing round comes as The Huffington Post
continues to experience significant growth following the expansion of the site in 2007, when
HuffPost began rolling out a variety of new sections, including entertainment, politics, media,
living, style and green. The site also started its first local version, HuffPost Chicago. This
year, The Huffington Post received widespread attention for its original reporting on the 2008
presidential race, including the coverage provided by its OffTheBus team of citizen journalists.
HuffPost currently has 46 employees./em/p pemHarman joins The Huffington Post board of directors,
whose members include: Eric Hippeau, Managing Partner of Softbank Capital, Arianna Huffington,
Kenneth Lerer and Betsy Morgan./em/p pstrongSee Also: /stronga
href="../../2008/11/huffington-post-raises-15-million"br /Huffington Post Hasn't Yet Raised $15
Million*/a/p pa href="http://feedads.googleadservices.com/~at/QULLtjVgaUuiCyJR7b-kZbKLhx4/a"img
src="http://feedads.googleadservices.com/~at/QULLtjVgaUuiCyJR7b-kZbKLhx4/i" border="0"
ismap="true"/img/a/pdiv class="feedflare" a
href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~f/typepad/alleyinsider/silicon_alley_insider?a=csV7M1cv"img
src="http://feedproxy.google.com/~f/typepad/alleyinsider/silicon_alley_insider?i=csV7M1cv"
border="0"/img/a a
href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~f/typepad/alleyinsider/silicon_alley_insider?a=oJ3QQfVj"img
src="http://feedproxy.google.com/~f/typepad/alleyinsider/silicon_alley_insider?d=52"
border="0"/img/a a
href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~f/typepad/alleyinsider/silicon_alley_insider?a=SgphfU8p"img
src="http://feedproxy.google.com/~f/typepad/alleyinsider/silicon_alley_insider?d=80"
border="0"/img/a a
href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~f/typepad/alleyinsider/silicon_alley_insider?a=WecCMWPQ"img
src="http://feedproxy.google.com/~f/typepad/alleyinsider/silicon_alley_insider?i=WecCMWPQ"
border="0"/img/a a
href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~f/typepad/alleyinsider/silicon_alley_insider?a=W5bvZ3fA"img
src="http://feedproxy.google.com/~f/typepad/alleyinsider/silicon_alley_insider?d=131"
border="0"/img/a a
href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~f/typepad/alleyinsider/silicon_alley_insider?a=b4GBLfzv"img
src="http://feedproxy.google.com/~f/typepad/alleyinsider/silicon_alley_insider?d=336"
border="0"/img/a a
href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~f/typepad/alleyinsider/silicon_alley_insider?a=lcYOFx3M"img
src="http://feedproxy.google.com/~f/typepad/alleyinsider/silicon_alley_insider?d=41"
border="0"/img/a a
href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~f/typepad/alleyinsider/silicon_alley_insider?a=tCgn2OzM"img
src="http://feedproxy.google.com/~f/typepad/alleyinsider/silicon_alley_insider?d=50"
border="0"/img/a /divimg
src="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/typepad/alleyinsider/silicon_alley_insider/~4/DvM5DOQ6MlA"
height="1" width="1"/

|
Guardian Unlimited -
13 hours and 13 minutes ago
divimg alt=""
src="http://hits.guardian.co.uk/b/ss/guardiangu-feeds/1/H.15.1/21713?ns=guardianpageName=World+news%3A+Israeli+navy+blocks+Gaza+aid+shipch=World+newsc3=guardian.co.ukc4=Israel+and+the+Palestinian+territories+%28News%29%2CLibya+%28News%29%2CMiddle+East+%28News%29%2CAid+and+development+%28Society%29%2CWorld+newsc5=Policy+Society%2CNot+commercially+usefulc6=Rory+McCarthyc7=2008_12_01c8=1126877c9=articlec10=GUc11=World+newsc12=Israel+and+the+Palestinian+territoriesc13=c14=h2=GU%2FWorld+news%2FIsrael+and+the+Palestinian+territories"
width="1" height="1" //divpThe Israeli navy today prevented a Libyan ship carrying 3,000 tonnes of
humanitarian aid for Palestinians from docking in Gaza./ppThe al-Marwa, carrying food, blankets and
powdered milk, attempted to challenge a
href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/israelandthepalestinians"Israel/a's tight economic blockade
on the Gaza Strip, which has worsened in recent weeks. /ppBut as the ship approached Gazan water at
dawn, an Israeli naval ship ordered it to turn back. The al-Marwa headed south and has reportedly
docked at al-Arish, an Egyptian port in the northern Sinai just south of Gaza./ppAn Israeli foreign
ministry spokesman said there was no physical contact with the ship but it was ordered back by
radio. "This is a policy we have had for a long time: if somebody wants to bring in humanitarian
aid they can do it through the border with Egypt or the Israeli passages into Gaza," said the
spokesman, Andy David./ppHowever, since the Palestinian Islamist group Hamas won parliamentary
elections nearly three years ago, Israel has imposed a
href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/nov/13/israel-gaza-blockade"ever tighter restrictions/a
on Gaza. /ppWhen Hamas took full control of Gaza last summer those restrictions became an economic
blockade, while Egypt has also kept its one crossing into Gaza at Rafah largely closed./ppAs a
ceasefire between Israel and Palestinian militant groups in Gaza has unravelled in the past month,
so the blockade has again been tightened. Deliveries of food, aid and fuel have been prevented on
most days and a
href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/nov/20/israelandthepalestinians-pressandpublishing"journalists/a
have been barred from entering./ppThree smaller boats carrying activists and some aid successfully
crossed into Gaza from Cyprus without being stopped by the Israeli navy. However, the Israelis
moved quickly to prevent the Libyan ship, which carried a much larger cargo, from entering./ppA
crowd of Palestinians had gathered at the Gaza City harbour from early in the morning ready to meet
the ship. Five trucks waited to offload the aid. /pp"The civilian boat carrying only humanitarian
supplies and food was turned away by an Israeli warship," said Jamal Khoudary, a Palestinian MP and
head of Gaza's Popular Committee against the Siege./ppSome reports suggested the aid might now be
unloaded in Egypt and delivered by road, although until now Egypt has been reluctant to turn the
Rafah crossing with Gaza into a regular route for deliveries. Egypt does not want to assume
responsibility for the strip and is also wary of the influence of Hamas./ppConcern is mounting
about the humanitarian conditions inside Gaza. Its sole power plant, which relies on fuel
deliveries from Israel, paid for by the European Union, was closed for two weeks in November and
only restarted last Thursday./ppIsrael says the crossings are being closed because of rocket fire
from Gaza into southern Israel and because of reported security threats on the crossings
themselves. /ppEvery few days a shipment of food or fuel is allowed in but figures from the UN show
in the past month an average of less than five truckloads a day have been allowed in, compared to
123 in October and 475 in May last year, just before Hama | |