To display the most relevant entries to you in priority,
vote for the stories you are interested in
(  )
and reject those that you are not interested in
(  )
CrunchGear -
8 hours and 1 minutes ago
All the cool kids are playing SSDs these days. So much so that every manufacturer wants of piece
of the sweet cherry pie. Even Plextor who
was previously known as an optical drive/media company has a set of 64GB and 128GB SSDs available
now. Too bad these options tastes more like a supermart-made pie than your grandma’s home
cooking.
Features:
- 128GB capacity
- 64MB on-board cache
- SATA II interface
- MSRP of $399
Pros
- It’s an SSD so it’s quiet and rugged
Cons
- Slower than other drives at same price point
- No TRIM support
Review:
SSDs are all about speed. That’s all that really matters so
I’ll cut to the chase. This drive is fast, where fast means it’s quicker than
standard spinning disk hard drives. And it should be since it’s a SSD hard drive. But
it’s also slow as it has noticably slower read/write speeds verses other SSDs in the same
price range.
This is important. Only a niche group of computer enthusiasts are willing to drop $400 on a 128GB
SSD hard drive. It’s crazy expensive when 1TB desktop drives can be had for around $70.
Obviously these people are willing to spend good cash for speed.
But this first generation Plextor simply cannot stand up to late generation drives from Corsair,
Crucial, or OCZ. I tested the SSD using HD Tune Pro 4.01 and it’s slower than
even the year-old OCZ Vertex 120GB model.
The advice here is to pay attention to your SSD purchase. There are a ton of different options
available now and not all of them are worth your money — like this Plextor drive. But
that’s just because of its high price. It’s a fine drive and I would have no qualms
about having it in my computer, but it needs to be priced at least a $100 less.
Product Page


|
NewTeeVee -
8 hours and 3 minutes ago
When companies are dying, it’s rarely a quick and painless process. Even so, the demise of
Blockbuster has felt like an especially drawn-out and painful one. The latest development came
late Tuesday when the company submitted an SEC filing warning
that it may file for Chapter 11 bankruptcy, which read in part,
Our future viability is dependent on our ability to execute these plans successfully. If we
fail to do so for any reason, we would not have adequate liquidity to fund our operations, would
not be able to continue as a going concern and could potentially be forced to seek relief through a
filing under U.S. Bankruptcy Code… It is possible that a successful and efficient
implementation of an exchange or any of the other strategies we are pursuing will require us to
make a pre-packaged, pre-arranged or other type of filing for protection under Chapter 11.
That couldn’t have been a very fun moment for Blockbuster. Still, if you’ve been
following the company, you’ve seen the white flag of surrender raised a few times before.
It was there in the company’s last earnings call, when CEO Jim Keyes talked about how
Netflix grew market share while his company focused on its balance sheet. It showed again
when Keyes appeared on
CNBC and, in response to rapidfire questions about Blockbuster’s strategy, he kept
putting on a hard-luck smile and insisting it wasn’t too late. And again when Blockbuster
re-introduced late fees in the stores — that is, in the stores it’s not planning
to shut down.
But informing investors of the possibility of bankruptcy is the law, and so Blockbuster is filing
to formally notify the SEC of what many investors already know. Of course, filing for bankruptcy
is hardly synonymous with corporate death. It simply means you seek court protection from
debt-holders while you restructure. In Blockbuster’s case, the move is seen as part of a
debt exchange with its creditors.
But once Blockbuster does emerge from bankruptcy, its larger
problems will still remain. It operates a chain of expensive brick and mortar stores in a
world turning digital. It tried and failed to price Netflix out of the DVD-by-mail business, and
sat back as Netflix built a loyal audience for its streaming movies. It passively let Coinstar
corner the DVD-rental-kiosk niche that further weakened its stores.
Now, according to Bloomberg, the company is exploring a consignment-sales model where Blockbuster
will, instead of buying DVDs from movie studios, rent them shelf space in
its stores. The move is aimed at cutting costs, but it will also lower revenue. And revenue
has already been in decline for the past several quarters. The company has also been
experimenting with new
ways to deliver movies, but lags behind Redbox’s rental kiosks and Netflix’s
instant streaming.
Blockbuster says it’s in discussions with movie studios about allowing its customers to
rent movies through Blockbuster Express (its answer to Coinstar’s Redbox kiosks) on the
same day that the movies are available for sale on DVDs. Currently, Netflix and Coinstar must
wait four weeks after the movies go on sale. But it’s not clear why studios will want to
award special privileges to a company that may be approaching bankruptcy.
Or possibly liquidation. Because if a restructuring doesn’t work, then Blockbuster might be
forced to shut sown and sell off its assets to pay its debts. Some vulture investors will lick
their chops over the prospect of a distressed retailer because of the value of the real estate it
owns. But Blockbuster is likely to disappoint here as well. As Keyes pointed out on the CNBC
interview, it owns only 3,500 of its 6,500 stores, and rents the rest.
Related content on GigaOM Pro:
Who Wins
When Movies Are Available Everywhere? (subscription required)


|
Download Squad -
13 hours and 33 minutes ago
Filed under: Design,
Developer, Internet
Lifeyo is an incredible content management system for
someone just trying to put together their first website. The whole system is very web2.0, but they
manage to pull off this design cliché in a way which is actually useful -- all the dialogs are
sensibly laid out, and the large fonts and bright colors actually make the system less intimidating
to use.
Their business model is also quite straightforward, which is important for these kinds of things;
after all, you don't want to build a site and find out it's gone the next day because the company
went out of business. In Lifeyo's case, they work as a web host. You can either host your site for
free with an address such as http://omgponies.lifeyo.com, or you can pay them about $50/year for
hosting with your own .com domain name. You cannot download the site or manage it with your own
tools -- you're locked in to their own platform, but it's quite comprehensive.
Now that I think of it, the aesthetic is most reminiscent of Tumblr. Looks like they really took a page off Tumblr's book, but instead
of going for microblogging, they added everything needed for a small content website with a blog
(optional).
All in all, I'm very impressed with how comprehensive the service is. I took some time testing the
various options and took lots of screenshots which you can see after the fold.
Share
Note: While following screenshots show only the page editing interface,
the system also features a complete blog editor (very similar to Wordpress).
Each page is composed of "elements". These can be either text, images, or embedded videos. This is
a text element, and as you can see, the editor is WYSIWIG:
You can also edit the HTML directly:
Once you click an element out of editing mode you can also edit iyou can edit its contents or
"style" (not actual CSS, see the next image).
This is editing the "style" for the textbox above. Basically, you get to choose the background
color.
The editing interface has the requisite dropdown menu with a few elementary settings.
You can add images, which are saved.to a "photobank" so you can use them over and over again in
various parts of the site.
Your site dashboard features simple analytics -- visitor/hit counts and traffic sources.
There are simple How-To explanations for just about any operation:
Bottom line: Lifeyo is one of the most impressive CMSes I've seen for the "first
website ev4r!" niche. It can also be useful for one-off landing pages and other simple commercial
sites. My only gripe with it is that like many other services, it too neglects to support RTL
(right-to-left), and so cannot really be used for Arabic nor Hebrew.
Lifeyo is an incredible content management system for newbies originally appeared on Download Squad on Wed, 17 Mar 2010 10:00:00 EST. Please see
our terms for use of feeds.
Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments
Website
- Lifeyo
- Business
-
Content management system - HTML

|
TechCrunch -
14 hours and 22 minutes ago
AOL has
recruited a few celebrity chefs and foodies; including Curtis Stone, Food & Wine’s Gail
Simmons, and Marcus Samuelsson; and the famed Culinary Institute of America to launch food website
KitchenDaily. Similar to Epicurious, AllRecipes, or
FoodNetwork.com, KitchenDaily features a recipe
database of meals that have been tested by top chefs, food magazine and cookbook publishers.
AOL has recruited a number of talent from Conde Nast’s recently
shuttered Gourmet Magazine. Former Gourmet Editor Cheryl Brown is the editor-in-chief with a
number of former Gourmet writers named as contributors. Epicurious’ Megan Steintrager will
be the senior editor of the site.
In addition to recipes, KitchenDaily will feature a meal-planner tool, cooking lessons, cookbook
reviews, and and more than 250 instructional videos created by celebrity chefs and industry
insiders. AOL already has a food blog called Slashfood
though its unclear how the two sites will be integrated.
The recipe site space is crowded, with a number of worthy competitors vying for traffic. And even
Microsoft’s Bing launched its own recipe
search product. But its seems that KitchenDaily aims to be part magazine, part recipe site, so it
may be able to differentiate itself and possibly attract many former Gourmet readers. We know
that AOL CEO Tim Armstrong is bullish on niche content
so the launch of this site fits into the company’s strategy nicely.
CrunchBase InformationAOLInformation provided by CrunchBase


|
Rezo.net -
16 hours and 57 minutes ago
Elle court, elle court La rumeur. Amplifiée, déformée, elle occupe la toile et
alimente les conversations. A la maison, au bistrot, à la machine à café, tout
le monde ne parle plus que de ça : la politique de Nicolas Sarkozy serait une catastrophe
sociale. En parcourant (le nez bouché) certains sites « bien informés »
de la tentacule internet, on est abreuvé de chiffres extravagants. Du taux chômage au
nombre de travailleurs précaires, de minimum vieillesse au seuil de pauvreté, tout
est bon pour alimenter La rumeur. Jusqu'aux réductions de charges patronales, niches
fiscales et dette de l'état. (...) Source: Le blog de Jean-Pierre Martin
|
Techdirt -
19 hours and 30 minutes ago
We've pointed to numerous studies, at this point, that have
all found that, when done right, free ebooks can greatly increase the sales of physical books (and,
in some cases, even of ebooks). Here's another empirical example of that in action. Chris Anderson points us to a
blog post by someone at a mid-list niche publisher, talking about how successful its experiments with "free" ebooks have been. In this case, the
publisher would offer up the first book in a series as a free ebook, and found that it drove
massive increases in sales: One of our free titles was the #1 download on Amazon for the entire
month of February. The subsequent sales of books 2 and 3 in the series increased by a rate of 20 to
1. For this series, digital sales are approaching 20% of the total product sales distribution and
growing. With the visibility of the digital sales on Amazon, we have seen a substantial increase in
print sales to the brick and mortar book chains. In this one instance, digital is driving print
sales. Basically, what this publisher realized is that with most books, obscurity is a greater
threat than "piracy," and free helps deal with that: Much of the talk by the big 6 publishers
has been stress over cannibalization of print sales, or the idea of replacement sales, by ebooks.
For midlist publishers such as ourselves, I believe we fight against substitution. We capture the
"browser" market. If our title is not available or visible, a customer will simply substitute for
another one in the genre. Free gave us the visibility that we could not purchase.
Permalink | Comments | Email This Story


|
Mashable! -
1 days and 7 hours ago
Samsung is
the next consumer electronics manufacturer to come out swinging against Apple’s iPad. A
senior executive confirmed plans to release a “slate PC” during the second half of this
year.
The key differentiating points for this tablet will address what Samsung feels are two major
shortcomings of the iPad: lack of processing power and not enough connectivity options.
“I do feel that that slate-type platform has legs but I think the legs need to be far more
powerful, for example an Atom-based product which has far greater flexibility, not to mention
inputs and outputs,” said Director of Samsung Australia’s IT division Philip Newton
at the Samsung Forum in Singapore. “This has more potential than an iPad.”
The goal is to build a device powerful enough to become the primary computing machine for many
people. The ARM chip that powers Apple’s iPad
was deemed not powerful enough to make the tablet form factor truly shine; hence Samsung reports
that it is looking at two platforms from Intel to power the unnamed device: Atom or the Moorestown System on a
Chip.
The slate will be a device “you could take to university and do a PowerPoint presentation
on it, for example, or a device that could be taken home or to the office and docked,”
Samsung’s Emmanuele Silanesu said .
Samsung is no stranger to the “in-between smartphone and laptop” zone, having
released the Q1 ultra-mobile PC (pictured above right) back in 2006. Silanesu assures us that the
forthcoming new tablet will have a much stronger focus on the consumer market than the Q1, which
“was a very niche product for a vertical market… It was limited (in functionality),
the price was relatively high, and it wasn’t an attractive device for consumers.”
It’s not terribly much to go on yet, but how do you think Samsung’s planned device
might stack up against the other crop of
iPad alternative hopefuls? Are you interested in some flavor of tablet device, and if so,
what features should it have?
[via Boy Genius Report]
Tags: apple, atom, ipad,
moorsetown, Q1, samsung,
samsung tablet, Tablet, tablets


|
BetaNews.Com -
1 days and 10 hours ago
By Tim Conneally, Betanews
Google's first attempt at directly selling an Android-powered mobile phone is already being called a flop thanks to reports from mobile analytics company
Flurry that estimate sales to have been around 135,000 units in the first 74 days on the market
(compared to 1.05 million Motorola Droids, 1 million iPhones.)
However, Google's approach to selling the device is vastly different from the more common methods
employed by wireless carriers: it has been primarily sold unlocked for $529 directly from Google,
or for $179 with a special T-Mobile plan. Since the device was released, there's been a "Coming
soon: Spring 2010" section that shows Verizon Wireless and Vodafone as the next US and European
carriers.
Today, Google expanded the device's compatibility in a different direction, and rolled out a
version compatible with AT&T in the U.S. and Rogers in Canada. It is now the second Android
device on AT&T behind the Motorola Backflip. Rogers currently offers a goodly amount of
Android devices, including the HTC Dream and Magic (known as the G1 and MyTouch 3G in the U.S.)
LG Eve, Samsung Galaxy Spica, and soon the Sony Ericsson Xperia X10.
So instead of a CDMA version as expected, today we've got a device that supports 850/1900/2100
MHz 3G/UMTS bands, and one that supports the 900/AWS/2100 MHz 3G/UMTS bands used by T-Mobile.
Selling the device unlocked is unlikely to greatly expand its popularity, as it still only
appeals to a niche audience.
Copyright Betanews, Inc. 2010


|
Eurogamer - News -
1 days and 19 hours ago
It's sold nearly a quarter of a million.
Sony Japan localisation specialist Yeonkyung Kim has admitted that the company's decision not to
publish cult dungeon crawl Demon's Souls worldwide was an error.
"That was a mistake," Kim told an audience at GDC last week, according to 1UP. "It should have
come out as a first-party title."
Sony published the From-developed PS3 game in Japan, but, assuming it to be a niche project that
would fail outside the country, passed up on worldwide rights.
Read more...
|
|
What is Matoumba?
A website that sorts everyday the most relevant information to you.
Vote for the news and Matoumba will learn your tastes and the information that you like the most.
It is all FREE!
|