All about patents

Kotaku Originals: Hot Fun in the Summertime [Kotaku Originals]

Amazon Wants Patent For Inserting Ads Into Books

Sony patents more motion tech, uses everyday objects

Amazon Wants Patent For Inserting Ads Into Books

Apple patents point to haptics, fingerprints, RFID

News: Sony patents motion control using ordinary objects

Apple considers 'active' packaging for handhelds

'Active packagin' patent

Apple considers 'active' packaging for handhelds

Will Hybrid Patents Help or Hinder the Technology?

Apple's 'active packaging' patent application tries to reinvent the box

What's Next: Obama gives 'Einstein' the go-ahead, while China gives 'Green Dam' a thumbs-down

BetaNews.Com

- 1 days and 5 hours ago

By Angela Gunn and the Betanews Staff, Betanews

What's Now | What's Next main banner Seattle nerds are hereby ordered to appear in costume and with a canned-food donation in Fremont at 6:00 pm PDT today (Friday) to help set the world record for largest gathering of lurching zombies. (Zombies and silly world-record attempts: It doesn't get geekier. Xbox 360's even co-sponsoring, for pete's sake. Also, BRAAAAINS!) The pyrotechnicans among us are enjoined to keep safe.

Federal judge admonished (and that's all) for explicit material on personal site

The 21st century, believe it or not • Ninth Circuit Chief Judge Alex Kozinski, legendary for concluding his opinion in a certain high-profile free-speech case with "The parties are advised to chill," has been reprimanded after a yearlong investigation for having various explicit (but legal) photos and videos on his family's Web site.

The panel had investigated claims first made in the Los Angeles Times stating, according to the decision yesterday, "the "website" -- http://alex.kozinski.com -- included 'a photo of naked women on all fours painted to look like cows,' 'a video of a half-dressed man cavorting with a sexually aroused farm animal,' and 'a graphic step-by-step pictorial in which a woman is seen shaving her pubic hair.' Regarding the alleged public accessibility of the 'website,' the article reported that the Judge 'said that he thought the site was for his private storage and that he was not aware the images could be seen by the public, although he also said he had shared some material on the site with friends.'"

Friends? Oh, well...With apologies to the jurist, who once called blogs "hateful things", we link to three for the more interesting coverage of the decision. Law.com explains the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals' reasoning. Ashby Jones at The Wall Street Journal (its Law Blog, in fact, but shh!) reached Judge Kozinski for a quote and reports that he is "pleased that today's unanimous decision reaffirms what I have said all along about my private files: They were kept on a private server and were not intended to be shared publicly." And AmLaw Daily, which does a nice job of explaining how a disgruntled lawyer started this particular ball rolling, links to the 41-page opinion, originally filed last June 5.

Californians gain access to database of lawmakers' votes

June 16, 2009 • MAPLight and the California First Amendment Coalition have prevailed in one of those lawsuits you can't believe anyone would have to file in the 21st century: Announced only yesterday, they've settled a freedom-of-information lawsuit against the Office of Legislative Counsel of California. And what do they win, Johnny Olsen? Why, a machine-readable database of state lawmakers' votes, upgrading the previous plain-text dump on the California Legislative Information site.

The two groups filed suit in December 2008 after repeated requests to the Office of the Legislative Counsel for access to the database used to create the previous plain-text site, which was clunky and very hard to search. Since then, the OLC has stepped up its game, launching a Web site that indeed provides the data -- to the two public-interest groups or anyone else visiting the site -- in a structured and machine-readable format. Thus propitiated, the CFAC and MAPLight.org withdrew their suit. Going forward, MAPlight will combine the legislative database with data on donations to California legislators, in hopes of daylighting the connections between money and political capital. And both CFAC and MAPlight will be keeping an eye on the next big legislative database, known for now as "Inquire."

Conviction stemming from MySpace suicide tentatively overturned

July 2, 2009 • There's a difference between not being convicted of a crime and being found innocent of doing wrong. Daily Kos, covering what appears to be the conclusion of the Lori Drew case, accurately states that the decision is most likely a win for free speech on the Internet... and now, please, may the grown woman who tormented a fragile 13-year-old experience "nothing but pain and anguish for what she's done." Other pertinent words in the piece by AmbroseBurnside include "vile human being," "disgusting," "people we hate or abhor," and "a true victory for all of us who love the freedom the internet allows and want to keep it safe from more government intrusion."

Would Albert have really signed his name to this?

July 2009 > Once again, AT&T is crawling into bed with the NSA to screen computer traffic.

Last May, President Obama made an explicit pledge not to use federal government resources to spy on private Internet users. "Protecting this infrastructure will be a national security priority...[which] will not include monitoring private sector networks or Internet traffic," the President said at the time. "We will preserve and protect the personal privacy and civil liberties that we cherish as Americans."

Despite that pledge, as first reported by the Washington Post this morning, DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano told reporters that her department would proceed with a plan initiated by the Bush administration to screen Internet content, with the help of carriers such as AT&T, but presumably in a manner that would protect civil liberties.

The "Einstein 3" plan would, among other things, route Net traffic from civilian agencies through a monitoring system designed to parse for attacks or other intrusion attempts. The Obama administration has been figuring out which pieces of that system they mean to keep. Privacy advocates have been briefed, and say there's a lot of work to do to make this system work.

Green Dam is offline and China is on the fence

Perhaps no time after July 1, 2009 > The Chinese government hasn't given up on the Green Dam project, but between diplomatic protests, inadequate notice to manufacturers, and no strategy for controlling Mac or *nix machines, Beijing appears to have put the stewpot back on the stove.

The Chinese government has not issued any new statements on the matter since June 30, although multiple sources are reporting that PC manufacturers have been allowed to go ahead with their plans to install the "Green Dam for Escorting Children" filtering software on their systems if they want to.

The question is now, do they really want to, especially in the wake of last month's University of Michigan security report from Prof. J. Alex Halderman and his team, who discovered that Green Dam may not only be un-authentic but could cause a greater security problem than it solves.

"We examined the Green Dam software and found that it contains serious security vulnerabilities due to programming errors," Prof. Halderman's team wrote. "Once Green Dam is installed, any Web site the user visits can exploit these problems to take control of the computer. This could allow malicious sites to steal private data, send spam, or enlist the computer in a botnet. In addition, we found vulnerabilities in the way Green Dam processes blacklist updates that could allow the software makers or others to install malicious code during the update process. We found these problems with less than 12 hours of testing, and we believe they may be only the tip of the iceberg."

Loretta Chao and Ting-I Tsai, writing for The Wall Street Journal this morning after weeks of great coverage of the situation, aren't so sure that by "postponement," China's IT ministry means "doing this within our natural lifetimes." Chao and Tsai noted that "obfuscating" by Chinese officials in the press could mean that the project's simply headed for permanent limbo.

Jammie Thomas-Rasset will appeal RIAA case

Apparently until hell freezes over > Think about it: Based on trial outcome, Ms. Thomas-Rasset is a less sympathetic defendant than Lori Drew. Copycense beats its collective head against the desk on our behalf.

Asteroids: The Movie

Coming in 2010 to a theater near you > Cue the Jerry Goldsmith music, and the Genesis effect creating a brightly-colored planet. The "Universal" letters come into orbit and the cloudless planet settles into place. A triangular ship comes into focus, fires little white pellets into it, and blows it into pairs of smaller planets. First two, then four, until the screen is full of them.

How much do you want to bet? Seriously, as The Hollywood Reporter first reported, some of the team who's bringing you the GI Joe movie this year is working on a script for Universal next year for the film adaptation of the immortal Atari 1978 coin-op game "Asteroids." No casting has been done yet, and no plot points have yet been revealed (or probably yet even created).

You think it even needs a theme song? Or just BOM-bom-BOM-bom-BOM-bom-BOM with a siren or something in the background?

Friday's tech headlines

The Register

• Police serving in the UK's Crown Prosecution Service are being encouraged to prep for court testimony by doing research on Wikipedia.

• Apple may just keep coming at Psystar with the lawsuits, but the Mac-clone maker is on its way out of bankruptcy and refuses to lie down: "When life gives you apples, make applesauce." Oh my.

• Apple has applied for a patent for software that'll help bad karaoke singers improve their grasp of pitch and key. Alert Stockholm.

San Jose Mercury News

• The next time someone tells you that bloggers can't also be serious journalists (good morning, Judge Kozinski), you tell them about Alison van Diggelen, the proprietor of Fresh Dialogues. She's not making money from it, but her brand of interview-based environmental coverage is professional in just about every other way that matters. Mike Cassidy tells her story.

• Clean tech took a beating like everything else during the recession, but biofuels, better batteries, and the like saw improvements in venture-cap funding during the quarter just ended -- and confidence in the sector is up too, Tracy Seipel reports.

Washington Post

• Prisons in Maryland hope to cut down on inmates' mobile-phone communications by jamming signals near the facilities, but there are legal and technical consequences. Henri E. Cauvin has details.

Los Angeles Times

• The Performance Rights Act, which would put over-the-air radio stations on the hook for paying royalties to artists (as well as composers, which they do now), is making those stations nervous. More on that in a minute -- but first, 22 straight minutes of commercials and three replays of the latest Beyonce single!

• Some products just don't sell outside the brick-and-mortar environment: Hershey, the chocolatier, will close its online store as of July 31. There are closeout discounts over there if that kind of thing interests you.

Copyright Betanews, Inc. 2009

Add a comment

blog,1,products,fires,environments

Schmehl to Stallman on Mono ...

- 1 days and 5 hours ago

p2pnet news | Open Source:- Debian has no plans to include the Mono programming environment in the default GNOME installation, says Alexander Reichle-Schmehl, Debian developer and spokesman for the GNU/Linux distribution.

The news comes in response to the open letter written by Free Software founder Richard Stallman about the “Mono problem,” says Heise Online.

Says Stallman »»»

Debian’s decision to include Mono in the default installation, for the sake of Tomboy which is an application written in C#, leads the community in a risky direction. It is dangerous to depend on C#, so we need to discourage its use.

The problem is not unique to Mono; any free implementation of C# would raise the same issue. The danger is that Microsoft is probably planning to force all free C# implementations underground some day using software patents. (See http://swpat.org and http://progfree.org.) This is a serious danger, and only fools would ignore it until the day it actually happens. We need to take precautions now to protect ourselves from this future danger.

This is not to say that implementing C# is a bad thing. Free C# implementations permit users to run their C# programs on free platforms, which is good. (The GNU Project has an implementation of C# also, called Portable.NET.) Ideally we want to provide free implementations for all languages that programmers have used.

The problem is not in the C# implementations, but rather in Tomboy and other applications written in C#. If we lose the use of C#, we will lose them too. That doesn’t make them unethical, but it means that writing them and using them is taking a gratuitous risk.

We should systematically arrange to depend on the free C# implementations as little as possible. In other words, we should discourage people from writing programs in C#. Therefore, we should not include C# implementations in the default installation of GNU/Linux distributions, and we should distribute and recommend non-C# applications rather than comparable C# applications whenever possible.

But Reichle-Schmehl says this isn’t the case, and the default installation hasn’t changed, stating »»»

… in answer to your open letter Why free software shouldn’t depend on Mono or C# I like to explain a small misunderstanding that seems to have been spread pretty wide recently.

Debian has not to include Mono in the default installation, for the sake of Tomboy. The default installation â€“ or to be more precise: The default GNOME installation (there are installation media which install an KDE, Xfce or LXDE desktop by default, too) â€“ hasn’t changed. It still installs a more or less minimal Gnome Desktop without tomboy and without mono. As far as I know there haven’t been major changes in package selection for the GNOME installation media, nor are there major changes planed.

What really has changed is that one of our meta packages, which are mainly used to install a set of packages. Indeed our meta package to install everything gnome related got a dependency on Tomboy and will indeed pull in mono, too.

That doesn’t have any effect on the default installation (which doesn’t use that package) nor does it effect a major part of Debian’s GNOME users, who prefer to install gnome-desktop (a meta package to pull in a simple GNOME Desktop) or even the gnome-core meta-package (which installs the bare necessities to run GNOME applications). Please see the numbers at our popularity contest system for yourself.

So, Debian didn’t change the default installation (whatever that’s supposed to be) but the dependency of a package which is used by a minority of our users who explicitly wishes to install everything GNOME related (which is to the best of my knowledge in accordance with upstream developers who added tomboy to the default GNOME installation, too).

Stay tuned.

Follow p2pnet on Twitter.

More

Heise Online - Debian - Mono is not in our default installation, July 2, 2009
Stallman - Why free software shouldn’t depend on Mono or C#, June 26, 2009
Reichle-Schmehl - Dear Richard, June 30, 2009

Use free p2pnet newsfeeds for your site. It’s really easy!
Subscribe to p2pnet.net | | rss feed: http://p2pnet.net/p2p.rss | | Mobile - http://p2pnet.net/index-wml.phpNet access blocked by government restrictions? Use Psiphon from the Citizen Lab at the University of Toronto. Go here for details.

Add a comment

popularity,feed,environments,governments,2

Sony patent shows everyday objects used with motion control system

Imaginary Gadgets 0005: The fantastic machines of Leonardo

Wired: Beyond the Beyond

- 1 days and 10 hours ago

Imaginary Gadgets 0005: The fantastic machines of Leonardo

Who: Leonardo da Vinci

What: plans and sketches of imaginary objects from Da Vinci’s surviving codices.

When: circa 1480 â€“ 1519

Where: Florence, Milan, Rome, Bologna, Venice, Amboise

How: schemes of cosmopolitan polymathic artist-engineer.

Why: glory, intellectual mastery, royal commissions.

Leonardo da Vinci is the world’s most famous inventor of imaginary objects. At his death, he left some 18,000 pages of plans, schemes, drawings and writings. About 6,000 pages have since been rediscovered and published. They are the largest trove of writing by any Renaissance technologist.

These works were never published in his lifetime. Some of his writings seem clearly intended for an audience other than himself. Yet the pages of his journals are intermixed with accounts, lists, personal jottings, and so forth.

Da Vinci did built some real and functional devices: they were festival stage machineries, musical instruments, and (in one case) some palace plumbing. His other devices — and there were hundreds — never came to fruition. He also trifled with painting, a minor aspect of his work.

What was he thinking?

Da Vinci was extremely intellectual active. He also had a long career, so his engagement with physical objects came in intellectual phases.

A. The apprentice period. At fourteen, Da Vinci enters the Florentine atelier of Verocchio, an artist-engineer whose busy cultural factory involves drafting, painting, plaster casting, sculpture, metal-casting, architecture, carpentry and mechanics. As a famous craftsman in the most advanced city in the wealthiest region in the world, Verocchio is an urban contractor and a general factotum. Verocchio works on large-scale commissions and can be depended-upon by his patrons to carry out broad-scale commissions in a high style. The crew in his employ has a can-do attitude, similar to a movie crew. They do not much trouble themselves with specialization, because the technical professions have not yet been invented. There are no formal schools of engineering. Artist-engineers tackle creative problems as they find them. They rely on rules of thumb, revived ancient learning, and gossip.

As a teen, Da Vinci carefully studies the advanced machinery in Florentine construction sites, and draws the public works in detail. As an appentice to Verocchio, he likely has his first exposure to the semi-secret manuals of machines and engines, known as “theaters of machinery,” that were circulated in manuscript among adepts. He starts keeping notebooks of his own.

B. Hoping to ingratiate himself into the urban canal-building craze, Da Vinci studies dredges, locks, hoists, and dams. He becomes convinced that water is poorly understood, and that canal-builders get poor results because they rely too much on rules of thumb.

Da Vinci spends several years drawing water in motion. He creates a private physics / metaphysics of fluid mechanics. Occasionally he’s a minor consultant in urban water projects. He is never in charge of one, but these mighty efforts have such large budgets that his modest fees vanish into the haze. Da Vinci doggedly sketches and maps many superbly ambitious water projects which are never carried out.

C. Hired by an aggressive Duke of Milan, Da Vinci amuses his patron by creating large numbers of sadistic cartoon war machines, none of which are ever built or deployed in battle. The years in Milan are his most commercially successful period. He mostly works on directly-commissioned toy special-effects for Milanese court masques and parades. At this work he truly excels. Eventually a real war breaks out, the Duke is swiftly defeated and Da Vinci has to flee.

D. Da Vinci is introduced to geometry by a learned friend from the
court of Milan, now also in exile. Since geometry is composed from “elements,” Da Vinci becomes convinced that machines also have “elements.” Da Vinci now excels at drawing all the parts of all extant known machineries.

He spends many years ingeniously recombining the “elements” into
more-or-less plausible contraptions. Many look prophetic, and vaguely
anticipate future technical developments, but none are actually built.

Other Renaissance engineers such as Taccola and Francesco di Giorgio create illustrated catalogs. Da Vinci is familiar with these works. At one point he is employed by Cesare Borgia to loot a major library. Da Vinci never publishes any such catalog himself. He seems torn between an urge to publicize himself and and urge to hide his actual plans.

“Imaginary gadgets” are common rhetorical devices in the Renaissance.
Artist-engineers will take a relatively straightforward device, publicly known, and throw in a few excess working-parts to give the gadget an extra baroque gloss. These fantasy-machines are promotional brochures, meant to snow aristocrats into hiring their authors as wizardly experts.

No strict guidelines exist to separate practical from impractical machines, so most anything visually plausible will pass muster among high-ranking but technically illiterate patrons. Genuinely functional devices have a high risk of being stolen by rivals, since a patent system does not exist.

A great deal of borrowing, swapping, stealing and annotation goes on as gadget manuscripts are stolen, borrowed, looted or copied. Many Renaissance machine designs survive and thrive for centuries, although the names of their artist-engineer originators are lost or deliberately obscured.

E. Having broken machines into constituent “elements,” Da Vinci becomes obsessed with similarly dissecting animals and human beings. He becomes heavily reliant on first-hand visual observation. He distrusts the Latinate literary “learning” of traditionalists, who excel as political courtiers and can therefore frustrate his schemes.

Da Vinci regards the human body as a complex of machine elements and hydraulic forces. He invents a private physics involving “movement, weight, force and percussion” as the four powers uniting the macrocosmos and man, the microcosm. Drawings such as the famous Da Vinci “Vitruvian Man” are a scientific visualization of his theories.

F. Da Vinci further refines his drafting skills, becoming the best technical draftsman in the world. He is convinced that he has attained a new, more complete comprehension of nature, which combines precise perspective drawing with a deep understanding of primal forces known only to himself. Since he lacks any functional, experimentally grounded physics, he becomes convinced that an accurate, properly scaled drawing of an object implies that it will function in real life.

Da Vinci also creates a few three-dimensional models, mostly modelling human body parts.

A combination of bad luck, political turbulence and a well-deserved
reputation for missing deadlines denies Da Vinci any large-scale technical commissions. He never gets a chance to field-test his giant fantasy machines, yet his public reputation is extremely high. He works for powerful patrons and is widely considered one of the cleverest people in the world. His personal charisma frees him of any need to rely on publication for fame. He is accused of necromancy at one point, but the charge doesn’t stick.

Da Vinci spends a great deal of effort and time drawing flying machines. The machines look very much like living birds and bats. After years of drafting effort, Da Vinci manages to do some weight-ratio analysis. He then realizes that the human body lacks the strength to lift itself with flapping wings. He turns his attention to gliders but, since gliders don’t exist in nature, he can’t copy them by direct visual observation. His attempt to fly is stifled.

G. Da Vinci announces various plans to create a comprehensive encyclopedia of his immense hoard of autodidactic knowledge. This plan is never carried out. He is defeated by old age and the colossal size of his own archive. He spends a peaceable retirement chatting about philosophy with the young King of France, who is an ardent and generous admirer.

H. The posthumous period. Leonardo’s works are scattered by his heirs. Collectors and curiosa hunters have a hard time making any coherent sense of the great man’s eclectic musings. The papers are bundled in various ways that destroyed their original chronological order. Two thirds of the writings vanish.

I. Moderns re-interpret Da Vinci’s work. They are considered prophetic, although Da Vinci never describes futurity, or casts his work as something that people will do in the future. He is never plotting a future course for civilization; he is always planning schemes that he himself, his followers or patrons might care to do, if they can find the resources.

He makes no effort to advance learning in general. If a project fails to find financing, he abandons it. In certain especially hasty sketches, he seems to be ridding himself of nagging ideas in order to free himself to turn his attention to something more mentally refreshing.

Leonardo leaves no direct intellectual heirs; he founds no schools of thought; he invents nothing that goes into common technological practice. His ideas about physics are entirely idiosyncratic and see no further development.

His imaginary devices become extremely popular and are much admired
five hundred years later. Even then, however, nobody builds full-scale
replicas of his machines; nor do they develop them.

*******************************************

Atemporal Leonardo, or, a design exercise in the prepostmodern archaeofuturistic

Let’s now turn our attention to what it might mean to create Leonardo-style imaginary devices “in the Leonardo tradition.” How might his efforts achieve some vitality in contemporary circumstances? Is it possible to create/recreate an imaginary Leonardo imaginary-gadget?

A. Find and unite a group of “Renaissancepunks.” Attempt to please their tastes. These pastiches would lack “authenticity” — they would be pastiches of a period aesthetic. However, they might have pop-appeal. Fifteenth-century devices of wood and bronze would be fairly easy to mimic with contemporary hobby techniques. It should go without saying that few or none of them would “actually work.”

B. Study the Leonardo oeuvre with care. See if there are any obvious gaps in his combinations of the “elements of machines.” Since so much of his work is lost, Leonardo must have created hundreds of imaginary gadgets now lost. By filling any missing combinations, one might re-invent these. They would seem very Leonardo-like, and no one but a scholar would be able to tell that they were modern fakes/recreations.

C. Study Leonardo’s “machine elements” and create a generative-art program that combines them, generating thousands of “potential Leonardo machines.” Select the most appealing candidates and manufacture them.

D. Start a design-school project that models “Renaissance society.” Appoint a “Renaissance Lord” as judge. Distribute wood and bronze tinkertoy elements. Tell the students to create amazing model “war machines” so as the please the tyrant.

E. Model Leonardo’s elemental design approach, then apply it to modern materials such as plastics, aluminum, epoxy and so on. Alternately, take clearly implausible Leonardo schemes and see if they can work with more advanced materials. Alternately, take functional objects and make them unworkable in a Leonardo style.

F. Release an actual Leonardo plan as an “open-source instructable.” Pretend that you invented the device yourself. Give it to the “community.” See what happens.

G. Find a gifted painter who fully understands drafting and perspective. Hire him to become an engineer strictly *because* of his ignorance
of math and physics. See what he “invents.”

H. Reinvent “Leonardo physics.” Pretend that these late-medieval concepts represent actual physics. Make applied devices that would “work” in those parallel-world conditions. Game physics could be adapted to this.

J. Choose an imaginary Leonardo device, build a full-scale prototype, then tinker with it until it functions.
***********************************************

Add a comment

separates,experts,beings,game,court

The Daily Roundup: here's what you might've missed

iPhone 4.0 OS preview: Automatic is the Future

PMP Today

- 1 days and 18 hours ago

Want to a peek into the crystal ball and see what the future holds for you iPhone owners out there? Well, read on and be amazed at these potential iPhone 4.0 features that may soon be available in a firmware update down the road.

iphone-4.0-event-based-modes

Discovered in a bunch of pending patent applications, this first one is called “Event-based modes for electronic devices.” What this basically does is allow your iPhone to automatically adjust its setting based on your location and “life events”. So, what exactly are these “life events”?

[via unwiredview]
More details after the break.

Based on the patent application, “life events” can be any one of the following:

any location-based event (e.g., the device entering or exiting a specific geographical location, such as a country, or a specific type of location, such as a movie theater, etc.), any environment-based event (e.g., the device being subjected to a specific physical orientation, movement, temperature, sound, light, etc.), any calendar-based event (e.g., the device reaching a specific time of day, day of week, date, etc.), any usage-based event (e.g., the device being used for a specific function, for a specific period of time, the device’s battery having less than half of its capacity remaining, etc.), any news-based event (e.g., the device receiving information about a particular worldly occurrence, such as a weather forecast, news report, or sport score, etc.), and combinations thereof.

iphone-4.0-scheduled-communications

Another pending patent is called “User-programmed automated communications.“ This feature allows your iPhone to perform an appropriate action based on a particular event, location, caller and other similar conditions. Say, for example, it’s your wife’s birthday. This new feature will allow your iPhone to automatically send an SMS to your wife greeting her on her special day.

iphone-4.0-intelligent-communications

Last, but certainly not the least, there’s also a “Systems and methods for intelligent and customizable communications between devices” that’s also waiting for patent approval. Simply put, these allow you to set up your iPhone to respond accordingly and differently to your various contacts depending on your current situation and availability.

As you can see, these new iPhone features is all about automation, but being that these are all just patent applications, there’s really no guarantee that these will make it into the real world. These do, however, give us an idea of what to expect, and based on what we’ve seen so far, it sure looks good. How about you guys? What do you make of these iPhone features waiting for patent approval?

Add a comment

currents,environments,beings,basically,iphone