To display the most relevant entries to you in priority,
vote for the stories you are interested in
(  )
and reject those that you are not interested in
(  )
Read/WriteWeb -
11 hours and 45 minutes ago
Facebook may be denying any wrongdoing, but a
California judge is disagreeing with the social networks' disagreement to the tune of a $9.5
million dollar settlement today.
The Los
Angeles Times reports that the settlement comes in response to a class-action lawsuit over
Facebook's Beacon program that published what users were buying.
Sponsor
The decision allocates $6 million of the settlement to a "digital trust fund" that will go to
organizations that study online privacy, says the Times article. The Times explains the bit of
controversy hovering around this final decision:
Over the objections of privacy advocates, Facebook will have a seat on the fund's three-member
board. It consists of Chris Jay Hoofnagle, who heads the Berkeley Center for Law & Technology;
Tim Sparapani, Facebook's public policy director; and writer Larry Magid.
While some people are saying that the settlement is unfair in a few ways, Justin Brookman, a
senior resident fellow at the Center for Democracy and Technology, seemed to disagree. The
general contention has been that Facebook will have one seat on the three-member board for the
"digital trust fund" and that it was already required to pay money out to promote online privacy,
as our own Sarah Perez
discussed when the settlement was first announced last October.
Brookman said that today's decision is "a really good settlement for consumers", explaining that
"there are really very few settlements that come up with that type of monetary figure."
He also contended that, while Facebook will have a seat on the board, it will be a minority
member, as a majority vote requires two out of the three parties to agree. He said that the other
two members, Hoofnagle and Magid, were both good choices who will act in the public's interest.
"We have a lot of confidence they'll make wise awards of the money," he said. "They both
criticized Facebook when Beacon came out."
According to the Times, however, this may not be the end of the appeal process.
One privacy advocate said he was exploring whether he could appeal the decision. "This
sweetheart deal for Facebook is outrageous and another indication they don't really want to ensure
privacy online," said Jeffrey Chester, executive director of the Center for Digital Democracy.
Brookman noted, however, that a settlement like this for privacy issues was relatively
unprecedented.
Discuss


|
InformationWeek RSS Feed -
13 hours and 28 minutes ago
A Department Of Homeland Security pilot program allows some state, local, and private-sector
officials to access classified information about cyberthreats.

|
Pros Apologian -
13 hours and 34 minutes ago
James White
  I have an ambitious schedule today as I want to play comments by
William Lane Craig and Kevin Harris on the subject of Mormonism and the effort to help them become,
well, "more orthodox." This is a classic example of abandoning a biblical paradigm, the apostolic
example, and the use of a philosophically-oriented replacement, all the while painting those who
would follow the biblical mandate as "anti-Mormons." Given that we were involved in this field of
ministry years before these men, this is a must-do response.
 Hopefully that will not take more than 25 minutes or so, so that I
will have time to address the comments of Joseph M. Holden, M.Div., president of Veritas Seminary,
as he attempted to respond to the 1 John 5:1/ordo salutis discussion that has come up on the
Pastor's Perspective program a few times over the past month. Should be a helpful program, Lord
willing! So listen in live!
 Also, a quick word of correction (before we get
the graphic fixed) about the upcoming Dividing Line episodes with Michael Brown. The dates are 3/25
and 4/1, as noted. However, 4/1 is a Thursday. Both will be an hour earlier than the normal Tuesday
time so that Dr. Brown can do his own program at his regular time (we are much more flexible with
webcasting than he can be with his network commitments), hence 10am PDT/1pm EDT. The program will
run 90 minutes, no breaks, to get maximum presentation, discussion, and interaction. I have chosen
three texts for us to discuss on one program (John 6:35-45, Romans 8:28-9:24, Eph. 1:1-14) and he
gets to choose the texts for the other program (at the moment I only know the "all" passages will
be included as a group). Our goal is to have a more textually oriented exchange, more focused than
the programs we did before. I'm looking forward to them!

|
Autoblog -
15 hours and 7 minutes ago
Filed under: Performance,
UK
McLaren MP4-12C - Click above for high-res image gallery
At a press conference held at its technology center in the UK this morning, McLaren Automotive
officially launched itself into existence as a real, honest-to-goodness automaker. McLaren
Automotive chairman Ron Dennis introduced
the new MP4-12C by reminding the audience that
since McLaren entered Formula One competition in 1966, the team has won 25 percent of all the races
that have taken place. McLaren created the first carbon fiber chassis F1 car in 1981 and the first
series production road car with a carbon chassis. The now-departed Mercedes- McLaren SLR was the highest-selling carbon fiber
chassis road car ever (so far).
The MP4-12C is the next chapter in the story. Dennis emphasized that the MP4-12C and future McLaren
products will be engineered, manufactured and most importantly exported from the UK. Dennis
repeatedly used the word passion when discussing what McLaren wanted to achieve. Anthony Sheriff,
Managing Director of McLaren Automotive discussed the car in more detail. When the program started
five years ago, McLaren decided that it needed to be better than its competitors in Italy and
Germany. If a customer wanted a car as good as a Ferrari, Lamborghini or Porsche, they could just buy one of those cars.
Continue reading
after the jump and stay tuned for live images of the MP4-12C from McLaren's press
conference.
Gallery: McLaren
MP4-12C
    
[Source: McLaren]
Continue reading McLaren Automotive officially launches itself and MP4-12C
supercar [w/video]
McLaren Automotive officially launches itself and MP4-12C supercar [w/video] originally
appeared on Autoblog on Thu, 18 Mar 2010 09:01:00 EST.
Please see our terms for use of feeds.
Permalink | Email
this | Comments

|
Download Squad -
15 hours and 33 minutes ago
Filed under: Security,
Social Software
 The security pros at
Sophos Labs and
McAfee have noticed a disturbing increase in Facebook phishing attacks lately. Facebook is a
juicy target for this type of attack. Why?
For starters, there are 350 million + users to go after. On top of that, many are less
computer-savy users (like your parents and mine, teenagers, etc.) who may not be familiar with
malware and how to protect themselves. Add in the fact that Facebook makes a great, centralized
location to steal all kinds of information about you -- and a jumping off point to steal from your
contacts -- and it's easy to see why malware crews would target the site.
Take the jump for more on this particular attack, and how to avoid trouble (be sure to share with
your non-techy friends)!
The message reads as follows:
Dear user of facebook ,
Because of the measures taken to provide safety to our clients, your password has been changed. You
can find your new password in attached document.
Thanks,
Your Facebook.
Here are a few clues that this message is (and others like it are) fake:
-
It has an attachment: big, reputable sites like Facebook never send out emails
with attachments -- especially not on password or account alerts
-
It's addressed to "user of facebook": Facebook knows your real name, and they
use it when they email you.
-
The tone is too casual: an actual "safety alert" from Facebook would be
written in a much stronger tone.
-
It's too short: warnings from popular sites tend to be wordy. Bad guys, on the
other hand, are usually lazy and won't bother to write a lengthy message.
-
"facebook" isn't capitalized: that's a stylistic gaffe you'd never see on an
official Facebook message.
-
Facebook doesn't email new passwords: when you do a reset, for example,
they'll send a random code to your inbox and a link to a form where you can create a new
password.
If you've got a good antivirus program and you've kept it up-to-date, chances are good that
the attachment (and the message itself) will be detected. Not sure you're protected? Take a look at
our list of free antivirus
programs for Windows.
Another helpful download for less experienced users is a link scanner like WOT or AVG's LinkScanner
-- both are part of our list of 10+ tools for safe
web browsing.
Share
Facebook
users hit by password-stealing attack: here's how to stay safe! originally appeared on
Download Squad on Thu, 18 Mar 2010 08:35:00 EST.
Please see our terms for use of feeds.
Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments
Facebook
- McAfee
- Malware
- Phishing
- Anti-Virus

|
Techdirt -
15 hours and 36 minutes ago
About a year ago a prosecutor in Pennsylvania wanted to bring child porn charges against some
teenage girls who had taken some "nude and seminude" photos of themselves with cameraphones and
sent them to others. The case was complicated in that after school officials turned over the
evidence to the district attorney, the DA's office told the girls that they could avoid charges if
they agreed to a special afterschool "education program." Some of the girls refused, and the
prosecutor tried to charge them. This raised an outcry from many who felt it was ridiculous to
charge kids with child pornography for taking photos of themselves. The judges in the case blocked the prosecutor from filing
charges, but rather than take the hint, the prosecutor tried again with an appeal.
It looks like that was a dead end too. The appeals court unanimously ruled against the DA and criticized them for their efforts to bring
charges against these girls. This case won't necessarily directly apply to other similar cases --
as much of the reasoning had to do with the requirement to take this class and write an essay about
why what they did was "wrong," which was judged to be compelled speech, violating the First
Amendment. Furthermore, the fact that the lawsuit was seen as retaliating for not obeying the order
to take the class was also problematic. So, it's likely we'll still see other cases involving
"sexting," where teenagers are accused of creating child porn of themselves.
Permalink | Comments | Email This Story


|
Engadget -
17 hours ago
 DARPA wants to let you all know that its plans for the
robot apocalypse are still going strong.
The agency's got IBM working on the brains, has
an RFI out on the skin, and
is handling propulsion and
motor control in-house. Next up? Eyeballs. In order to give its robots the same sort of "visual
intelligence" currently limited to animals, DARPA is kicking off a new program called The Mind's
Eye with a one-day scientific conference this April. The goal is a "smart camera" that can not only
recognize objects, but also be able to describe what they're doing and why, allowing unmanned
bots and surveillance systems to report back, or -- we're extrapolating here -- make tactical
decisions of their own. To be clear, there's no funding or formal proposal requests for this
project quite yet. But if the code does come to fruition, DARPA, please: make sure autoexec.bat
includes a few Prime Directives.
DARPA
sets sights on cameras that understand originally appeared on Engadget on Thu, 18 Mar 2010 07:08:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.
Permalink Danger
Room | The
Mind's Eye (PDF) | Email this | Comments

|
Scientific American - Official RSS Feed -
17 hours and 8 minutes ago
Mammals, birds and fish living in the High Arctic experienced an average 26 percent drop in their
populations between 1970 and 2004 due to the loss of sea ice, according to a new report from The
Arctic Species Trend Index, "Tracking Trends in Arctic Wildlife ."
The 2010 report, commissioned and coordinated by the Whitehorse, Yukon–based Circumpolar
Biodiversity Monitoring Program (CBMP), was presented Wednesday at the State of the Arctic
Conference in Miami. It covers 965 populations of 365 species, representing 35 percent of all
known vertebrate species found in the Arctic.
[More]
|
PEOPLE.com: Top Headlines -
17 hours and 53 minutes ago
The actress says claims her new weight-loss program is a Scientology front are
"disturbing" 
|
Codestore Activity Log -
20 hours and 2 minutes ago
Last week I had an urgent support call to attend to as an e-commerce site I'd developed for a
customer had stopped taking payments. You can imagine I jumped on to it pretty sharpish.
The problem soon became apparent - the payment-processing terminal wasn't running. The server had
been re-booted and, although Domino re-started as a Service, as expected, the payment terminal
didn't. This is because I (stupidly) had put a shortcut to the program in the "All Users" Startup
Folder and assumed it would load if ever the machine re-started for any reason.
It turns out programs in the Startup folder only launch if a user logs in. In this case
nobody did and so they never launched. Seems so obvious. What was I thinking!
As a quick fix I had them log in to Windows. I then went about finding a way to have the terminal
launch without them needing to log in.
Launching Programs When Windows Boots
It turns out it's not as easy as you might imagine to run a program when Windows starts but
before a user logs in. The only solution I found was to create your very own Service.
The process of creating your own service to run a batch file is documented in this Microsoft Knowledge Base article.
However, it only allows you to run one BAT file and it has to be called AutoExNT.bat. Whereas, in
my case I wanted to run two different BAT files. One for each payment terminal (one live and one
for testing). It turns out you can do this by calling the two (or more I guess) batch files
directly from inside the AutoExNT.bat file.
Here's what my AutoExNT.bat file looks like:
start C:pathtobatch1launch.bat C:pathtobatch2launch.bat
The first line tells the existing command prompt to launch a new instance and load the first
batch file in it. The second line then goes on to run the other batch file. The result being two
command prompts running the code in the relevant batch file. Et voila.
Don't forget to install the Service with the /interactive flag set to On if you want to see the
prompts yourself when you log in. Oh, and to check the Service is set to Automatic.

|
BLABBERMOUTH.NET Latest News -
20 hours and 11 minutes ago
KISS vocalist/guitarist Paul Stanley will guest on today's (Thursday, March 18) edition of "Sixx
Sense", the new national radio program hosted by MÖTLEY CRÜE bassist Nikki Sixx.
|
PRWeb: Art and Entertainment Web sites / Internet -
20 hours and 12 minutes ago
April 2010: The Perfect Pairings Menu Campaign brings together 50 of Los Angeles’ most
talked about chefs and restaurants to raise funds for the nation's largest Meals on Wheels
program. Throughout the month, participating restaurants will feature delicious food + beverage
pairings on their menus tagged with the Perfect Pairings fork-and-bottle logo. When these
exceptional items are ordered, a portion of proceeds is directly donated to Los Angeles' St.
Vincent Meals on Wheels. (PRWeb Mar 18, 2010)
Read the full story at http://www.prweb.com/releases/perfectpairings/losangeles2010/prweb3715004.htm
|
TechCrunch -
21 hours and 50 minutes ago
Silicon Valley has
long been heralded as the Mecca for startups, but it isn’t the only city in California to
give rise to promising tech companies. Los Angeles has a growing startup community, and is home
to startups like DocStoc and a few much larger businesses, like MySpace and CitySearch. One
program looking to help foster  that community is Launchpad LA, which has just opened applications for the second
round of its mentorship program.
The program was created by Mark Suster
of GRP Partners, who previously founded BuildOnline (acquired
by SWORD Group) and later Koral (acquired by Salesforce,
where he became VP Product Management). Â The criteria for interested companies:
startups have raised more than $1 million (or institutional venture capital), and are willing to
move to Los Angeles, where the program is based.
As with incubator programs like Y Combinator and
Techstars, Launchpad LA invites VCs and other mentors from
the area to help mentor participating companies. Â But unlike those programs, it
doesn’t directly invest in the companies — it’s purely for
mentorship. That said, many VCs and angel investors in the Los Angeles area have some
involvement, so it has played a role in those companies getting funding down the road.
Mentors for the last program included Mike Jones, who is now co-President of MySpace,
DocStoc’s Jason Nazar, and Adam Bain of Fox Media Interactive. The last program included 13
companies, including Mobile Roadie,Â
Movoxx
, and GumGum.


|
Wikinews -
22 hours and 22 minutes ago
Thursday, March 18, 2010
United States Secretary of Homeland Security Janet
Napolitano has announced that the US Government has ended funding for a controversial "virtual
fence" along the US-Mexico border.
The program, called SBInet, will have $50 million from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act
of 2009 that was allocated to it withdrawn in favor of investment in other, immediately
available technology for the purposes of security along the border. The program will also have
all further funding immediately frozen; as a result, all work will halt on the project beyond two
small test projects in Arizona. Officially, the move is in light of a pending reassessment of the
program, though it is likely that it signals the end of the five-year project, which has come
under mounting criticism based on cost and the time taken to complete the project.
More...

|
Bioinformatics -
1 days ago
Publication Date: 2010 Mar 12 PMID: 20228129Authors: Bouckaert, R. R.Journal:
BioinformaticsMOTIVATION: Bayesian analysis through programs like BEAST (Drummond and Rumbaut,
2007) and MrBayes (Huelsenbeck et al., 2001) provides a powerful method for reconstruction of
evolutionary relationships. One of the benefits of Bayesian methods is that well founded estimates
of uncertainty in models can be made available. So, for example not only the mean time of a most
recent common ancestor (tMRCA) is estimated, but also the spread. This distribution over model
space is represented by a set of trees, which can be rather large and difficult to interpret.
DensiTree is a tool that helps navigating these sets of trees. RESULTS: The main idea behind
DensiTree is to draw all trees in the set transparently. As a result, areas where a lot of the
trees agree in topology and branch lengths show up as highly colored areas, while areas with little
agreement show up as webs. This makes it possible to quickly get an impression of properties of the
tree set such as well supported clades, distribution of tMRCA and areas of topological uncertainty.
Thus, DensiTree provides a quick method for qualitative analysis of tree sets. AVAILABILITY:
DensiTree is freely available from http://compevol.auckland.ac.nz/software/DensiTree/. The program
is licensed under GPL and source code is available. CONTACT: remco@cs.auckland.ac.nz.post to:
CiteULike

|
del.icio.us/popular -
1 days ago
If you follow me on Twitter, you’ll occasionally hear me talk about “audience
atomization overcome.” I’ve been using this phrase to describe
something that has changed in our word because of the internet.
Audience Atomization Overcome
The people formerly
known as the audience, once connected up to big institutions and centers of power, but not
across to one another, have overcome their own atomization, which was a normal condition during
the age of mass media. With the rise of social media they are now connected horizontally, peer to
peer, at the same time as they connect vertically: to the news, the program, the speaker, the
spectacle. Simple example: Tweeting
during the Academy Awards. More intricate example: Pet lovers
find each other on affinity sites when the major media isn’t attentive to their
concerns.
The horizontal flow changes the situation for speakers and producers in any communication setting
that retains the trappings of one-to-many. The change is especially dramatic in an arena I know
well: the professional conference where I might sit on a panel or attend a presentation. The
popularity of the backchannel—years ago it was IRC, today it’s Twitter—has
empowered those in the audience to compare notes and pool their
dissatisfaction during a performance that misfires. Audience atomization has been
definitively overcome, raising the bar and increasing the risk for speakers who walk in
unprepared.
Especially at risk are “big name” speakers whose online or offline status is such
that they may complacently assume their presence alone completes the assignment and guarantees
success. Organizers may be so delighted to have landed the CEO of the hot company or the thought
leader in a particular space that they fail to ask for much in the way of new material or a
carefully thought-out ideas. This was always a problem at conferences; what’s different is
the audience is able to do something about it, and they will savage you on Twitter if you falter.
These facts were clearly in view for me and my colleagues as we prepared for our recent panel at
South by Southwest: The future of
context. We were acutely aware that the bar had been raised, especially at a conference like
SXSW where everyone is wired. When Twitter CEO Evan Williams appeared at South by Southwest for a
keynote interview, the answers felt so thin to so many that he had to post this after.
Here are ten things we did in recognition that audience atomization has been overcome. I must
say: our plan worked. The Future of Context was the most well-received panel I have ever
been on. (A good live blog of it is here, a reaction post here, a sample tweet here. The room—Hilton H, a big
one—was full and people were turned away.)
How to avoid getting killed in the backchannel
1. Unfamiliar to them, super familiar to you. First, you need a subject that
hasn’t been picked to death at conferences. But it’s got to be something you grok. I
wrote my first
post on background narratives vs. newsy updates in 2008; I’ve been thinking about it since then.
Co-panelist Matt Thompson introduced
the phrase “the future of context” in 08, as well. He spent a year on the problem as
a fellow at the University of Missouri. In a sense, we had two years prep time.
2. Go for intellectual diversity. We had a mainstream journalist (Matt Thompson of NPR) an academic (me) a software developer and
entrepreneur (Tristan Harris of Apture.com) and
a tech writer and reporter (Staci Kramer of
paidcontent.org.) The youngest panelist was less than half the age of the oldest. We had an
African-American and three whites, a woman and three men. People notice.
4. Get serious about advance planning. One conference call (“So
Sally…what do you want to talk about?”) is not what I mean by serious. We
had five calls over four months. We worked out a beginning, middle and end that made sense to all
of us: Frame the problem, drill down on a few specifics, float possible fixes, then go to the
crowd.
5. Blog it first. Eight days before the SXSW panel I posted News
Without the Narrative Needed to Make Sense of the News: What I Will Say at South by
Southwest. A few days later Matt Thompson posted The Case
for Context: My Opening Statement for SXSW and Tristan Harris came in with Context: The Future of the
Web. By blogging it first we could promote the event with something juicier than “come
to my panel!” We could use early reactions to
hone later presentations. We had three comment threads active before the panel started.
Here’s how I
curated the discussion my pre-post engendered. This pre-tweet told me to underline a key
distinction between informative and informable.
6. Create a dedicated site for the panel. Welcome your crowd to it. See futureofcontext.com, which Matt Thompson pulled together.
Anyone can post at it or comment. And it says
to the audience: welcome, we set a place for you.
7. The title you pick should be “write once, run anywhere.” (Why
that phrase?) Thus: the
future of context is simultaneously the name of the SXSW panel, the domain name of the site, the hashtag on twitter and the
search term we wanted to claim.
8. Watch the backchannel like a hawk during the event. This chart shows that the
hashtagged tweets were coming in at a rate of almost 300 an hour. It’s your
moderator’s job to monitor that flow, sense where it’s going and react when necessary
by talking directly to the
backchannel. This takes someone who can scan posts and type quickly. Staci Kramer did that. After
the five phone calls and the three blog posts and the dinner the night before to go over the
plan, she already knew what we were going to say, which allowed her to focus on the incoming.
9. Leave at least 40 percent of the time for Q and A. Anything less than that
and people start resenting you for hogging the mic. It’s amazing to me how many panels
cannot manage this simply feat of timing.
10.Arrange a meet-up directly after for those who want to continue the
discussion and interact with the participants face-to-face. This was something I wish we had
thought of. (It was suggested to me by Jeremy
Zilar of the New York Times, who attended.) That way no one walks away wishing there was more
time.
Now if you’re thinking that none of these ideas is particularly original or
ingenious— well, I agree. My point is you need a complete approach to avoid getting killed
in the backchannel and give demanding conference-goers what they have come to expect.
Of course there’s another alternative: the unconference, where the
room is the panel.

|
Joystiq -
1 days and 1 hours ago
 Back in 2009, we
spotted a
couple of GameStop surveys asking customers about the Edge card and a possible new rewards
program. According to Gamervision's
sources, the new rewards program will go into effect "by the end of this year." As detailed in the
aforementioned surveys (and corroborated by GV's sources), the rewards program is said to feature
two tiers, "one for everyone, and one that can only be earned by frequent use of the basic
card."
We contacted GameStop corporate for comment and were told, "We are in the process of evaluating
loyalty opportunities for our customers. As this is a work in progress, we are not going to comment
on speculation to changes to our Edge card program." While certainly not confirmation of any
changes taking place by the end of this year, it does affirm that the company is still considering
altering the Edge card at some point in the future. For now, though, a new "rewards program" seems
to be little more than a germinating idea.
[Thanks, Mike]
GameStop
still evaluating customer 'loyalty opportunity' program originally appeared on Joystiq on Wed, 17 Mar 2010 22:30:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.
Read | Permalink | Email
this | Comments

|
Joystiq -
1 days and 1 hours ago
 Back in 2009, we
spotted a
couple of GameStop surveys asking customers about the Edge card and a possible new rewards
program. According to Gamervision's
sources, the new rewards program will go into effect "by the end of this year." As detailed in the
aforementioned surveys (and corroborated by GV's sources), the rewards program is said to feature
two tiers, "one for everyone, and one that can only be earned by frequent use of the basic
card."
We contacted GameStop corporate for comment and were told, "We are in the process of evaluating
loyalty opportunities for our customers. As this is a work in progress, we are not going to comment
on speculation to changes to our Edge card program." While certainly not confirmation of any
changes taking place by the end of this year, it does affirm that the company is still considering
altering the Edge card at some point in the future. For now, though, a new "rewards program" seems
to be little more than a germinating idea.
[Thanks, Mike]
GameStop
still evaluating customer 'loyalty opportunity' program originally appeared on Joystiq on Wed, 17 Mar 2010 22:30:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.
Read | Permalink | Email
this | Comments


|
paidContent.org -
1 days and 3 hours ago
The NYTCo’s local content efforts are getting a quick boost from hyperlocal newswire
Fwix. In a sense, the deal with Fwix can buttress
the NYTimes.com’s New York metro area blogs program, The Local, which it began last
year. The deal enables the distribution of Fwix’s technology and hyperlocal content across
any of NYT’s Regional Media Group properties, as well as other properties such as Boston.com and NYTimes.com. For now, the deal will center on the various small
properties belonging to the NYTCo (NYSE: NYT), not the NYTimes.com itself—at least not right away, at least. The
first NYTCo paper to take advantage of Fwix’s newswire is the Press-Democrat in Santa Rosa, Ca.
|
paidContent.org -
1 days and 3 hours ago
The NYTCo’s local content efforts are getting a quick boost from hyperlocal newswire
Fwix. In a sense, the deal with Fwix can buttress
the NYTimes.com’s New York metro area blogs program, The Local, which it began last
year. The deal enables the distribution of Fwix’s technology and hyperlocal content across
any of NYT’s Regional Media Group properties, as well as other properties such as Boston.com and NYTimes.com. For now, the deal will center on the various small
properties belonging to the NYTCo (NYSE: NYT), not the NYTimes.com itself—at least not right away, at least. The
first NYTCo paper to take advantage of Fwix’s newswire is the Press-Democrat in Santa Rosa, Ca.
|
Read/WriteWeb -
1 days and 3 hours ago
Panda Security is
reporting a second incident of malware on Vodafone's HTC Magic, a Google Android smart phone.
it provide a clear example for how smartphones are prime targets to become botnets once connected
to a user's personal computer.
The incidents provide real-world examples of how companies can inadvertently spread malware. It
also raises questions about the quality assurance testing done by manufacturers and the carriers.
Sponsor
After the first
discovery earlier this month, Vodafone said it was an isolated incident. But two days later
the company announced the HTC Magic would be
discontinued. Vodafone also deleted questions about the issue from its forums.
A Panda employee discovered the "Mariposa," virus after connecting it via USB her PC. Her Panda
Cloud Anti-Virus software detected the malicious code, revealing that the smart phone was
infected and spreading the virus to the PC.
Mariposa is a program that turns infected machines into botnets. it has infected more than 13
million computers, stealing credit card and bank log-in information.
In the second incident, an IT security expert who had bought the phone learned about the virus
discovery. He decided to test his phone, using AVG anti-virus protection. Sure enough, his device
also showed it had malware on it.
According to Panda Security:
This guy had also purchased an HTC Magic direct from Vodafone's official website the same week
as my co-worker. He hadn't connected the phone to his PC yet, but as soon as he saw the news
hurried back home, plugged it in via USB and scanned its memory card with both MalwareBytes and AVG
Free. Lo and behold, Mariposa emerged again, exactly in the same way as in our original finding.
The HTC Magic has historically been sold in Europe.
Discuss


|
Autoblog -
1 days and 4 hours ago
Filed under: Car Buying,
Coupe, Performance, Japan, Lexus
Lease-only Lexus LFA - Click above for high-res image gallery
The rich are very different from you and we, now more than ever. First off, we don't have the
mental fortitude for jumping through all of the hoops that Lexus is making potential LFA customers limbo beneath. Let alone the cash. Thing is, the
rigamarole involved never mattered because Lexus is only making 500 examples of the LFA and we're
simply not going to lose sleep over the process it takes to park one in our garage. However, a
potential LFA owner sent us a copy of his order guide, and like any good train wreck, we can't look
away. Also, remember, this info ain't intended for public consumption.
For your living-vicarious pleasure, here's how it works: As reported, you cannot buy Lexus' first
ever supercar. You have to lease
the mostly-carbon-fiber-and-unobtanium LFA. That's sort of good news for the non-disgustingly
wealthy, right? After all, leases are the cheap and easy way to get into a new car. Are you sitting
down? The monthly lease payment on the Lexus LFA is $12.398.44. For 24 months. That's $297,562.56
worth of lease payments over two years, at the end of which you own nothing.
However, Lexus is quick to point out that the LFA's MSRP is $375,000, so you're technically not
paying full price. And at the end of 24 months, lessees are free to plunk down an additional
$93,750 (more than the base price of a very comparable Nissan GT-R, we should mention) and buy their LFA outright.
Of course, you can't just waltz into your local Lexus dealership with $12,398.44 and rocket waltz
out in an LFA. Lexus has to actually select you to lease its (admittedly awesome) car. Once you're
chosen, you've got 10 days to drop off a $10,000 deposit at your local Lexus dealer and submit to a
credit check. We should mention that this will not be the only deposit and credit check Lexus
requires.
Once your credit checks out, you then have to deposit an additional $50,000. To mini-recap, that's
$60,000 down on a $375,000 car. Sounds reasonable (from a detached, algebraic ratio perspective)
until you remember that you're not buying the car, just leasing it. All of this will be/is
happening from March-June 2010. Production of the LFA doesn't start until December. We don't know
how long each car will take to build, but customers lessees will be required to go through a second
credit check immediately prior to delivery. We're not entirely sure you really want to pass the
second credit check. Here's why.
Remember the $12,398.44 per month lease payment we mentioned a couple paragraphs up? That's just
the breakdown. All LFAs are being doled out via Lexus' 1Pay Lease Program. Meaning that to lease
the LFA, you hand Lexus a check for $237,562.56, which is the full amount of the lease minus your
$60,000 pair of deposits. Oh, and there's a $700 "aquisition fee." Plus tax, title, license and
registration. The good news? Even though you have to lease the LFA, because of the lengthy
approval/deposit process, each car is still made to order. Meaning that even though you don't own
the car, you can still order it in Passionate Pink, a $3,000 option.
Make the jump to read the pricing guide.
Gallery: First
Drive: 2011 Lexus LFA
   
Continue reading Lease the Lexus LFA for $12,400 per month, $298,000 due at
signing
Lease
the Lexus LFA for $12,400 per month, $298,000 due at signing originally appeared on Autoblog on Wed, 17 Mar 2010 19:27:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.
Permalink | Email
this | Comments

|
del.icio.us/popular -
1 days and 4 hours ago
A while ago Jeff and I had Eric Sink
on the Stack Overflow Podcast, and we were yammering on about version control, especially the
trendy new distributed version control systems, like Mercurial and Git.
In that podcast, I said, “To me, the fact that they make branching and merging easier just
means that your coworkers are more likely to branch and merge, and you’re more likely to be
confused.”

This is what Taco looks like nowWell, you know, that podcast is not prepared carefully in
advance; it’s just a couple of people shooting the breeze. So what usually happens is that
we says things that are, to use the technical term, wrong. Usually they are wrong
either in details or in spirit, or in details and in spirit, but this time, I was just
plain wrong. Like strawberry pizza. Or jalapeño bagels. WRONG.
Long before this podcast occurred, my team had switched to Mercurial, and the switch
really confused me, so I hired someone to check in code for me (just kidding). I did
struggle along for a while by memorizing a few key commands, imagining that they were working
just like Subversion, but when something didn’t go the way it would have with Subversion, I
got confused, and would pretty much just have to run down the hall to get Benjamin or Jacob to
help.
And then my team said, hey you know what? This Mercurial bug-juice is really amazing, we want to
actually make a code review product that works with it, and, and, what’s more, we think
that there’s a big market providing commercial support and hosting for it (Mercurial itself
is freely available under GPL, but a lot of corporations want some kind of support before
they’ll use something).
And I thought, what do I know? But as you know I don’t really make the decisions around
here, because “management is a support function,” so they took all the
interns, all six of them, and set off to build a product around Mercurial.
I decided I better figure out what the heck is going on with this “distributed version
control” stuff before somebody asks me a question about the products that my company
allegedly sells, and I don’t have an answer, and somebody in the blogo-“sphere”
writes another article about me junking the sharp.
And I studied, and studied, and finally figured something out. Which I want to share with you.
With distributed version control, the distributed part is actually not the most
interesting part.
The interesting part is that these systems think in terms of changes, not in terms of
versions.
That’s a very zen-like thing to say, I know. Traditional version control thinks: OK, I have
version 1. And now I have version 2. And now I have version 3.
And distributed version control thinks, I had nothing. And then I got these changes. And then I
got these other changes.
It’s a different Program Model, so the user
model has to change.
In Subversion, you might think, “bring my version up to date with the main version”
or “go back to the previous version.”
In Mercurial, you think, “get me Jacob’s change set” or “let’s just
forget that change set.”
If you come at Mercurial with a Subversion mindset, things will almost work, but when
they don’t, you’ll be confused, unhappy, and unsuccessful, and you’ll hate
Mercurial.
Whereas if you free your mind and reimagine version control, and grok the zen of the difference
between thinking about managing the versions vs. thinking about managing the
changes, you’ll become enlightened and happy and realize that this is the way
version control was meant to work.
I know, it’s strange... since 1972 everyone was thinking
that we were manipulating versions, but, it turned out, surprisingly, that thinking about the
changes themselves as first class solved a very important problem: the problem of
merging branched code.
And here is the most important point, indeed, the most important thing that we’ve
learned about developer productivity in a decade. It’s so important that it merits a place
as the very last opinion piece that I write, so if you only remember one thing, remember this:
When you manage changes instead of managing versions, merging works better, and
therefore, you can branch any time your organizational goals require it, because merging back
will be a piece of cake.
I can’t tell you how many Subversion users have told me the following story: “We
tried to branch our code, and that worked fine. But when it came time to merge back, it
was a complete nightmare and we had to practically reapply every change by hand, and we swore
never again and we developed a new way of developing software using if
statements instead of branches.”
Sometimes they’re even kind of proud of this new, single-trunk invention of theirs. As if
it’s a virtue to work around the fact that your version control tool is not doing what
it’s meant to do.
With distributed version control, merges are easy and work fine. So you can
actually have a stable branch and a development branch, or create long-lived branches for your QA
team where they test things before deployment, or you can create short-lived branches to try out
new ideas and see how they work.
This is too important to miss out on. This is possibly the biggest advance in software
development technology in the ten years I’ve been writing articles here.
Or, to put it another way, I’d go back to C++ before I gave up on Mercurial.
If you are using Subversion, stop it. Just stop. Subversion = Leeches. Mercurial and Git =
Antibiotics. We have better technology now.
Because
so many people dive into Mercurial without fully understanding the new program model, which can
leave them thinking that it’s broken and malicious, I wrote a Mercurial tutorial, HgInit.
Today, when people ask me about that podcast where I dissed DVCS, I tell them that it was just a
very carefully planned fake-out of my long time friend and competitor Eric Sink, who makes a
non-distributed version control system. Like that time he started selling bug-tracking
software, and, to punish him, we sent him a very expensive Fog Creek backpack with a fake form
letter that made it look like we were doing so well that expensive backpacks were the standard
Christmas gift we were sending every FogBugz customer.
I seem to have run out the clock on this site. It has been an extreme honor to have you reading
my essays over the last ten years. I couldn’t ask for a greater group of readers. Whether
you’re one of the hundreds of people who volunteered their time to translate articles into
over 40 languages, or the 22,894 people who has taken the time to send me an email, or the 50,838
people who subscribed to the email newsletter, or the 2,262,348 people per year who visited the
website and read some of the 1067 articles I’ve written, I sincerely thank you for your
attention.
Need to hire a really great programmer? Want a job that doesn't drive you crazy? Visit the
Joel on Software Job Board: Great software jobs,
great people.

|
BMC Bioinformatics -
1 days and 5 hours ago
Publication Date: 2010 Mar 12 PMID: 20226024Authors: Paluszewski, M. - Hamelryck, T.Journal: BMC
BioinformaticsABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Mocapy++ is a toolkit for parameter learning and inference in
dynamic Bayesian networks (DBNs). It supports a wide range of DBN architectures and probability
distributions, including distributions from directional statistics (the statistics of angles,
directions and orientations). RESULTS: The program package is freely available under the GNU
General Public Licence (GPL) from SourceForge (http://sourceforge.net/projects/mocapy). The package
contains the source for building the Mocapy++ library, several usage examples and the user manual.
CONCLUSIONS: Mocapy++ is especially suitable for constructing probabilistic models of biomolecular
structure, due to its support for directional statistics. In particular, it supports the Kent
distribution on the sphere and the bivariate von Mises distribution on the torus. These
distributions have proven useful to formulate probabilistic models of protein and RNA structure in
atomic detail.post to:
CiteULike

|
|
What is Matoumba?
A website that sorts everyday the most relevant information to you.
Vote for the news and Matoumba will learn your tastes and the information that you like the most.
It is all FREE!
|