To display the most relevant entries to you in priority,
vote for the stories you are interested in
()
and reject those that you are not interested in
()
Uploading.com is the leading service among those providing file storing, sharing and transferring
services. The service makes use of the newest high-speed and most important reliable server
network; possessing almost unlimited memory and working on multi-gigabyte Internet connections. We
guarantee safety, confidentiality, stability and convenience.
Who uses Uploading.com?
Millions of people from various countries and all walks of life use Uploading.com every single day.
In other words, Uploading.com is a great place to be for students, businessmen, housewives,
doctors, insurance agents, drivers, brokers - anyone at all!
What are the advantages of using Uploading.com?
* The Uploading.com service is absolutely free.
* You don't need extra software. All you need is a regular Internet browser. Uploading.com is easy
to use, convenient and user-friendly.
* Your files will never get lost or corrupted. No one will ever be able to delete the file except
for you and Uploading.com. The latter happens only if you risk breaking our terms.
* You can download files from our servers at any time of day.
* If the file has been corrupted or lost on your computer, you will always be able to download it
again.
* Uploading.com is a lot safer and easier to use than email. You can transmit files of any size -
just upload the files to our website. You won't need to send the files to every single person who
needs them. Just one link to the files will save time. Your friends and coworkers will be able to
download the files at any time of day by following the link.
* We guarantee that we do not change the files in any way, and you will be able to download them
from our server safe and sound, just the way you uploaded them. Our servers enjoy a very high level
of protection, and file substitution by 3rd parties is impossible.
* Now you won't have to waste your precious time thinking how to transfer files to another
computer, be it at home, at work, or at an Internet cafe. Just upload the files to Uploading.com
and get them exactly where you need to.
What kinds of files do people usually upload?
Business people generally upload Word, Excel, and PowerPoint files; as well as project plans,
conference minutes, contracts, research data, server configuration files, advertising brochures,
etc.
Other people make use of our services by uploading their pics, music and video files, as well as
games, software, and cell phone files like ringtones and backgrounds.
The list is endless, actually. You can use Uploading.com for any kind of uploads provided they are
legal and they don't contradict our terms of service.
How long will my files be stored?
Files are stored for as long as you want them to be kept on our website as long as they continue to
be downloaded within 30 days.
Is it possible that the uploaded file will just disappear?
No, it's not. But again, that's provided you keep to our Terms of service. Files are stored for as
long as you want them to be kept on our website as long as they are of interest to anyone at all.
The files are available for downloading 24/7. It's guaranteed.
Here is a payment proof :
http://img122.hotlinkimage.com/showimg.php?id=1976190924&v=3223023889&ext=jpg&dt=1
I have a fake paypal with fake name ,adress,phone etc and verified with vcc card .Today my account
is limited becouse I received more than 1k euro (Exactly 1010euro) and 1k is the limit,When I log
into my pp account I see message to resolve problem ,I can send money and receive but I cant close
my account,They want to I send them my photo id ,proof of adress,and that I provide business
information.
I had 300 $ on my account today and when I saw this message I payed my hosting (240$) and sent 50$
to my friends pp acount.
What do you think can I have some problems if I dont send photo id....and just never log in again
into that pp account.
Can they they reversed transactions to my host and my friends pp account
Build
a 1/20 cubic inch robot with a gripper that can pick up and move small objects. It is
controlled by a Picaxe microcontroller. At this point in time, I believe this may be the world's
smallest wheeled robot with a gripper. That will no doubt change, tomorrow or next week, when
someone builds something smaller.
The main problem with building really small robots is the relatively large size of even the
smallest motors and batteries. They take up most of the volume of a micro robot. I am
experimenting with ways to eventually make robots that are truly microscopic. As an interim step,
I made the three tiny robots and the controller described in this instructable. I believe with
modifications, these proof of concept robots, could be scaled down to microscopic size.
Michael Mann's latest crime opus has already hit theaters, and like most of his devoted fans, I was
there opening day. Granted, my desire to be first in line for Public Enemies mainly had to do with
my preoccupation with pretty boys in nice suits, but trust me, there were some loftier ideals at
work. One of the reasons I love Mann's films is that he finds new ways to tell relatively
traditional stories...which brings me to Miami Vice. Vice definitely wasn't one of Mann's most popular films, but I
always defend this flick, and here's why: growing up, I watched Miami Vice, and I might have loved
it, but even at the tender age of 10 I knew it was kind of silly. I had always wondered what the
series would have looked like if the show had a little less cheap humor about Crockett and his
alligator and a little more 'dignity' -- fast forward to 2006, and that's exactly what Mann
did.
Gone were the over the top white suits and wise cracks (I mean, thank god I didn't have to watch
Colin Farrell yucking it
up with 'Elvis'), and instead, Mann replaced them with a darker, meaner, and (dare I say it?) more
realistic Miami Vice. But just because Mann brought Vice into the present, didn't mean that those
traditional touches were gone, and the teaser was proof. That first trailer had it all -- the
music perfectly timed with every shotgun
pump, speedboats, helicopters, guns and hot girls...and you can't get more Miami Vice than
that.
After the jump; the teaser and a reminder of Vice on the small screen..
Proof positive that owning an Apple computer is far more dangerous than a PC. Alright, alright, all
joking aside, I’m glad the lady that was shot is okay and let us all hope the suspect is
caught and gets what he has coming.
An employee of an Apple store in Arlington was shot and wounded this morning during an attempted
armed robbery in a back storeroom as more than three-dozen shoppers and other employees milled
about the showroom.
Letting a pup have a few bites of corn isn't a horrible idea provided she's not
allergic, but I wouldn't recommend doing this on a regular basis. The issue is not with the
kernels (which can be a dog food "filler" item), but cobs are very dangerous for pets - they can
cause intestinal obstruction if swallowed! Make sure to hold on tight while she nibbles,
and throw it away in a pet-proof trash can after the snack to make sure she doesn't go in for
seconds.
To make things even less exciting, the Delicious extension is about as un-noteworthy as they come.
If you've got the 'Bookmark on Delicious' bookmarklet in Chrome already, guess what? The extension
does the exact same thing. All it does is create a Delicious icon at the end of your address bar
instead of on your bookmark toolbar.
I don't know about you, but that's nothing to get worked up about. Google's three example
extensions? Equally yawn-worthy.
Heck, I'm still waiting for integration with Google services. Anyone else wondering where the
support for things like Google Bookmarks is? It is their browser, after all.
Don't get me wrong - I love Chrome's speed and minimal UI, but after this long I thought we'd see
some much more interesting extensions. If you know one, please share it in the comments. I'd love
to see it!
To make things even less exciting, the Delicious extension is about as un-noteworthy as they come.
If you've got the 'Bookmark on Delicious' bookmarklet in Chrome already, guess what? The extension
does the exact same thing. All it does is create a Delicious icon at the end of your address bar
instead of on your bookmark toolbar.
I don't know about you, but that's nothing to get worked up about. Google's three example
extensions? Equally yawn-worthy.
Heck, I'm still waiting for integration with Google services. Anyone else wondering where the
support for things like Google Bookmarks is? It is their browser, after all.
Don't get me wrong - I love Chrome's speed and minimal UI, but after this long I thought we'd see
some much more interesting extensions. If you know one, please share it in the comments. I'd love
to see it!
Those not doing intense gaming can, these days, get by with onboard graphics solutions, eschewing
the extra heat production, and power consumption, of the external graphics card.
These days, it is nothing to have 1 GB of video buffer memory on a PCIe card, though only the
newest, most complex games will actually need the memory or use the extreme processing speed of
the graphics processor, Sapphire Technology, a major supplier of AMD/ATi
graphics solutions, is not immune to the pursuit of making scads of money
from the few who wish to have the greatest, fastest, or most costly video card included in their
computer case.
Because there is lots of money to be made in this segment, Sapphire has announced a Radeon card
with 2 GB of onboard RAM, and an exotic cooling system.
Sapphire Technology is currently gearing up to introduce a new RV790 card, namely, a Radeon HD
4890 Vapor-X with 2GB of onboard memory, which is double the amount found on the
previously-released Vapor-X model. Other than the added memory, the new card isn’t
different from its slightly older relative and features a blue PCB, the dual-slot Vapor-X cooling
solution, 800 Stream Processors, and factory overclocked frequencies - 870 MHz for the GPU and
4200 MHz for the GDDR5 memory.
The 2GB Radeon comes with D-Sub, DVI, HDMI and DisplayPort outputs and is available for pre-order
around Europe for as low as 226 Euro.
the dual slot cooler means that heat from the video card should ideally flow out the back of
the case, but solid case fans make certain air flows as designed
if you plan on one of these, plan on some good
cooling for your case, and a large power supply.
Boasting nearly every type of video connector known to current usage, I would prefer a second DVI
port, because D-sub conversion is simple, and doesn’t suffer from being fragile. Display
Port, for anyone other than an Apple owner, is a solution in search of a problem, so its
inclusion here is superfluous. (It does, however, lead some to see the card as more obsolescence
proof – clearly the uninformed).
Sapphire does usually make a solid product, and does not deviate from the reference firmware, so
ATi drivers work without problems.
Whenever we talk about Mac clone makers such as Psystar, we all more or less accept as a fact that
Apple is selling copies of its Mac OS X operating system at a price lower than it would have been
if Apple did not have a hardware business. Even though we treat this statement as fact - recently,
I've been wondering: where is the proof? Read more on this exclusive OSNews article...
Whenever we talk about Mac clone makers such as Psystar, we all more or less accept as a fact that
Apple is selling copies of its Mac OS X operating system at a price lower than it would have been
if Apple did not have a hardware business. Even though we treat this statement as fact - recently,
I've been wondering: where is the proof? Read more on this exclusive OSNews article...
Is an IP address sufficient evidence to prosecute an alleged file-sharer? This is a question that
has been tackled by many in legal circles around the world. Some countries, including Canada, have
court rulings that suggested that it wasn’t sufficient evidence by itself. In spite of this,
ACS Law in the UK seems to think that it is. As a result, a number of users are stepping forward to
say that they were wrongly accused of copyright infringement.
Let’s back up here for a moment. An IP address can be found on a P2P network. A great
example is BitTorrent where one merely has to jump into a swarm using Azureus or uTorrent and
check out the seeders and leachers in the swarm to find an IP address.
Technicalities aside, why can’t that IP address be used as evidence? That’s actually
relatively straight forward – you can’t tie that IP address to a person as reasonable
proof. What an IP can reveal in some countries is whoever pays the bills for the internet access
to which that IP address belongs to. That doesn’t make that person immediately guilty of
copyright infringement because of what can happen with an internet subscription.
Does this person live alone? Or, like countless people, do they share that connection with
someone else? What if it was a family in question? Numerous cases have shown that it’s
frequently not the owner of the IP address, but someone else using the connection at the time.
On top of that, what about Wifi? The use of Wifi is on the rise and numerous people do lack the
technical expertise to encrypt their connection. That means anyone with a Wifi enabled laptop can
use that connection. Few would dispute that unauthorized WiFi use can be bad in densely populated
places. Even if the connection is encrypted, tech savvy individuals can find ways of bypassing
the encryption via simple hacking methods such as a dictionary attack (all the possible words in
a dictionary are fed through until one word works)
These are just two reasonably possible ways that the owner of a given IP address would not be
guilty of copyright infringement. There are plenty of other ways that an IP address can bring on
false accusations and there have been false accusations in the past.
The BBC points
out that Which?, a magazine, has researched the subject and have found 20 people stepping forward
to proclaim their innocence to copyright infringement accusations.
These cases come from the over 6,000 legal threats sent out demanding £665 from last year.
If that rings a bell for many observers, it should because it stems from the infamous Dream
Pinball lawsuits. Among the 20 users that came forward, many of them say that they have never
even heard of the game before. From the BBC report:
Some 6,000 letters have been sent out by law firm ACS Law, on behalf of firms such as Reality
Pump and Topware Interactive, who are the copyright owners of video games Two Worlds and Dream
Pinball respectively.
The government is keen to crack down on pirates, and the recently published Digital Britain
report said that they could be pursued through the courts.
“The government is basically calling for a crackdown on illegal file-sharers, which is fair
enough, but we’ve got serious concerns about the process which identifies alleged
file-sharers and we believe that innocent people are being accused,” said Sarah Kidner,
editor of Which? Computing.
The IP addresses of alleged file-sharers are initially obtained by anti-piracy firm Logistep
which uses software that monitors file-sharing sites.
While the Internet Service Provider Association said that the legal process is flawed, it brings
up an even greater question even though Daven Port Lyon dropped the cases because of an
investigation by the Solicitors Regulation Authority. What should happen when someone files a
false copyright infringement claim? Shouldn’t there be repercussions to guard against such
things as we are clearly seeing here?
If one sends a few hundred, let along thousands as seen in the Dream Pinball fiasco, what
guarantees each and every one of those legal threats are going to be targeting the correct
individuals? If there’s no repercussions from filing a false notice, what’s to stop
the copyright industry from suing every single identifiable IP address (0.0.0.0 –
255.255.255.255) and just dropping the cases for those who can use financial means to legally
fight back? One wonders what the definition of a shakedown is if these kinds of actions
aren’t. This isn’t even touching the kind of legal overhead that would result in the
already strained judicial systems in many countries around the world.
This is not to say these questions are necessarily new. As we’ve noted, these questions
have been raised before countless times throughout the years. They are nothing new, yet, the same
questions are either being raised or need to be raised. Sending 10,000 legal threats may sound
like a good deterrent on paper, but when someone is falsely accused, that’s not just an
anomaly, that’s potentially ruining someone’s life unnecessarily.
This is just another example on why it is absolutely critical to have protections against false
claims. Not just paying out a few hundred dollars, but fully compensating people who have been
falsely accused is what is important and making it feasible for victims to carry through with it.
Have a tip? Want to contact the author? You can do so by sending a PM via the forums or via e-mail at
drew@zeropaid.com.
Mama-Say-Mama-Saw-Mama-Would have to hear it to believe it. This one doesn't really need much of
a setup.
While fans the world over mourn the passing
of the King of Pop, the King of Talk, Rush Limbaugh, put the death of Michael Jackson this way: He "flourished under Reagan,"
"languished under Clinton/Bush, and died under Obama." Over on MSNBC, both David Shuster and Chuck Todd poked Limbaugh for
his unsavory take on the tragedy, with Todd quipping, "It's always Reagan, right?"
Meanwhile, El Rushbo's
pals over at Fox News knew exactly how to interpret the wall-to-wall coverage of Jackson's death. An
actual Fox News chyron alleged a "cover-up" because the media were
devoting more coverage to Jackson than cap-and-trade legislation. Lord, the fun one could have
using this very rationale to pick apart the stories Fox chooses to cover. I guess when you're a
hammer, everything is a ... wild conspiracy designed to frighten your audience and fan the flames
of their paranoia.
Other major stories this week:
Ricci-ing for the absurd
Several weeks ago, conservatives took a first run at undermining the nomination of Judge Sonia
Sotomayor. But their everything-and-the-kitchen-sink attack
plan -- charging that she is an unqualified, Marxist, radical activist and a reverse
racist/normal racist who is also, interestingly, far too empathetic to be on the Supreme Court --
fell flat under the weight of serious examination.
This week, however, offered another opportunity for media conservatives to revisit their central
criticism: that Sotomayor's "wise Latina woman" comment was a window into the prejudicial
soul of the judge who ruled against hard-working white firefighters (and a Hispanic firefighter)
simply because they weren't black.
First, the facts. On Tuesday, ABC's Bob Woodruff misstated the crux of the case, reporting
that Ricci v. DeStefano involved firefighters "passed over for promotion in
favor of less qualified black candidates." In fact, no one was promoted over anyone else. Rather,
the results of a test to determine which members of the New Haven Fire Department could receive
promotions were thrown out because city officials were unhappy with a racial disparity in the
results and stated they feared being sued for racial discrimination. In the
decision that Sotomayor joined denying en banc rehearing of the appeal of the district
court's decision, Judge Barrington Parker -- a George W. Bush appointee -- wrote that "the City
acted out of a concern that certifying the exam results would have an adverse impact on minority
candidates" -- a view that fit cleanly within previous Supreme Court precedent. That decision was
overturned by the 5-4 vote of the Supreme Court on Monday.
Instead of looking at the legal merits of the case, conservatives have drawn the conclusion that
Sotomayor was actively seeking to promote African-American firefighters at the expense of
everyone else. The Washington Timesopined that the case showed how, "[i]n Judge
Sotomayor's America, people are judged by the color of their skin, not the content of their
character." Investor's Business Dailychimed in as well: "The Supreme Court's
overturning of high-court nominee Sonia Sotomayor's ruling in the New Haven firefighter case
exposes what lies at the core of her misguided philosophy: stark racial favoritism."
Of course, Limbaugh, who has accused Sotomayor of racism on numerousoccasions since her nomination was announced, was
the most vocal: "Sonia Sotomayor was following
her basic instinct: She is racist."
Most judges nominated by Democrats are accused by the right of being radicals, and Sotomayor is
no different -- numerous efforts were made this week to portray the court's reversal of
Ricci as proof of Sotomayor's inherent radicalism. But the fact of the matter is, four
Supreme Court justices, including Justice David Souter, whom Sotomayor was nominated to replace,
agreed with her -- a fact that conservatives have done their best to cover up.
A number of media conservatives subsequently claimed that the court had
unanimously rejected Sotomayor's reasoning. Ed Whelan (who can't use The Google) and Kathryn Lopez of
National Review Online started the trend ("9-0 Against
Sotomayor"), followed quickly by Fox News' Laura Ingraham and Rush. Ingraham's Fox News colleague Sean Hannity
wasn't far behind. In fact, while Justice Ruth
Bader Ginsburg wrote in her dissent that
"[o]rdinarily, a remand for fresh consideration would be in order" and that "I would not oppose a
remand for further proceedings fair to both sides," she concluded, consistent with the 2nd U.S.
Circuit Court of Appeals decision, which Sotomayor joined: "[W]hat this case does not present is
race-based discrimination in violation of Title VII."
Furthermore, an article in Politicopromoted the myth that a Supreme Court
reversal is unusual, even though the court has reversed more than 60 percent of the federal
appeals court cases it considered each year since 2004. In doing so, Politico was
following The Washington Times, which had already argued that such an outcome would be
an "extraordinary rebuke" of Sotomayor. It should come as no surprise, then, that Fox's Alexis
Glick impartially described the ruling as "a major slap" to
Sotomayor. And for MSNBC's Joe Scarborough, the whole episode showed that it isn't just Sotomayor
who is out of touch: nearly half of the Supreme Court is, too.
When the AP and The New York Timesfailed to note false statements by Republican Sen. Jeff
Sessions, they revealed just how far-reaching the problematic reporting on Sotomayor has become.
It's clear that plenty of work needs to be done to ensure that she will have a fair hearing when
she finally comes before the Senate. At least Jonathan Capehart is bringing some rationality to the discussion.
Franken victory sparks conservative media panic-fest
This week, the Minnesota Supreme Court ruled
unanimously that Al Franken be officially certified as the winner of last fall's U.S. Senate
election in the state. Shortly after the decision came down, former Sen. Norm Coleman conceded
defeat, making it clear he wouldn't launch additional legal efforts to stop Franken from being
seated.
Conservatives in the media were beside themselves. Franken, after all, made a handsome living
sparring with the likes of Fox News,
Limbaugh, and, perhaps most notably, Bill O'Reilly (still mustseeTV after all these years.)
Fox & Friends co-host Brian Kilmeade -- or "brown-haired guy
who isn't Steve Doocy," as Stephen Colbert would say -- epitomized the conservative media's
response to the official Franken victory. First, he was "in denial," describing Franken as someone who "is barely
sane." Then he confessed that "it hurt" to call Franken "a
senator from Minnesota" and wondered about "who's safe now." He wasn't done quite yet -- he would
go on to call Franken an "embarrassment," "hateful,"
"maniacal," "angry, evil," and a "bitter partisan."
Kilmeade was hardly alone at Fox. It seems the entire network was "in denial." Saying a lot more about himself
than Franken, Glenn Beck said, "This is like having me in the Senate. ...
[I]t shows that we've lost our minds."
Limbaugh wasn't too happy with Franken's win, either. He compared the Iranian recount to the Minnesota
Senate recount and called Franken a "genuine lunatic" to boot.
Clear Channel's Jim Quinn shared Rush's assessment, saying Franken had "stolen" the election while
pegging ACORN as a likely culprit. Is there anything media conservatives won't blame on ACORN?
Proving once again that the real joke during this hyper-extended campaign was not the fact that a
former comedian might win, but the way the media covered the long legal
battle, Politico's Mike Allen claimed Franken prevailed because "[h]e
shut his mouth, and when you are Al Franken, that's not easy to do," while MSNBC's Mike Barnicle
said that it was "kind of a surprise" that
Franken "behaved like a responsible adult."
The global warming whistleblower who wasn't
It's hard to believe, but some conservatives aren't convinced that global warming is real. In
fact, some of them think it's a left-wing, anti-American conspiracy, nothing more than propaganda pushed by the liberal media and
traitorous members of Congress, all in the hope
of turning you into eco-slaves. Scared yet? So is Fox News' Dick
Morris, who, when it comes to this issue, is apparently one-third sane.
It's no wonder, then, that the conservative media sighs with relief when somebody wakes up and
tells the truth! Someone honest and courageous. Someone like Alan Carlin, a "legendary" EPA official and co-author of an
internal document disproving global warming -- a document that the agency then "suppressed," presumably stomping on it with a
Birkenstock.
According to the EPA's own records, Carlin is an economist, not a climate scientist -- something
Fox's Steve Doocy and Gretchen Carlson ignored when they
hosted him on Wednesday to discuss his work. Furthermore, the report he authored made a false and deceptive claim: that global
temperatures "have declined for 11 years," a reality he said the EPA ignored. Fox News duly
reported it as gospel, as did CBSNews.com, without context or correction.
In fact, the EPA did review Carlin's work and decided it was flawed. No wonder, as Gavin Schmidt,
a climate modeler at NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies, described it as possessing "a number of basic
flaws" and demonstrating a "complete lack of appreciation of the importance of natural
variability on short time scales."
But who is a scientist like Schmidt to criticize someone who ... isn't a scientist? I mean, how
about a little respect? Heck, even a reputable publication like The Washington Times
says the earth is getting cooler. Let's not lose our heads here.
This weekly wrap-up was compiled by Karl Frisch, a senior fellow atMedia
Matters. Frisch also contributes toCounty
Fair, a media blog featuring links to progressive media criticism from around the
Web as well as original commentary.
The newspaper people will tell you that if they are obliterated by the evil internets one of the
big loses will be investigative journalism. If it hadn’t been for those gritty investigative
journalists the newspaper hires there’d be no Watergate, no Whitewater Gate, no ‘Gates
of any kind.
Of course, that’s just plain silly. Newspapers didn’t invent investigative journalism
any more than they invented news or reporting news.
In fact, in this digital age where anyone willing to do the work can spill the beans to a massive
audience, there is more reason than ever for independent investigators to step up to the plate.
The folks at QuarryGirl, a blog dedicated to animal rights, have done just that.
Having been given a great deal of anecdotal proof that some food at Vegan restaurants around LA
contained animal by-products, they decided to see if they could prove it. One might assume, as a
bunch of bloggers with, potentially, no J-school experience whatsoever, they might make a hash of
things. Instead, they made a plan:
Here's an outline of the plan:
Locate a facility that has no traces of egg, casein or shellfish in which to perform the
advanced tests
Purchase anti-contamination equipment including industrial sterilization supplies, lab coats,
uncontaminated bags, swabs, razor blades, gloves and floor coverings
Obtain highly restricted industrial food testing "kits" only available to the food
manufacturing industry
Develop a regimented process to test each food item with the highest standards of inter-test
cleanliness, ensuring that absolutely no food particles from one food item contaminate another
Select a diverse set of menu items from 100% vegan-only restaurants throughout LA (with one
exception, see later)
Order the food for carry-out, and seal it in an airtight bag in its original packaging either
inside, or very close to the point of purchase
Transport the food items to the testing facility intact and sealed, and perform the tests
within 48 hours of purchase, keeping them refrigerated until immediately before the test
Develop a strict bracketing control, with a thorough analysis of the testing facility and
equipment before testing: A negative control to ensure no pre-existing contamination, and a
positive control test on a known-positive food product (containing all three target non-vegan
items) to ensure that the tests do indicate positive results
Conduct the test in absolute secrecy to ensure that no restaurant would know they were
providing samples, and pose as regular customers ordering take-out food in a normal way, with no
disclosure that the items would be used for a test.
So, we divided up the work between us, and dedicated a Friday evening, Saturday and Sunday as
well as over $1,000 of our collective money to pulling off the most extensive scientific test
that we know of to find out, once and for all, if samples of restaurant food are vegan or not.
Not sure about you, but that sounds like a pretty sound plan. Find out what happened here.
This is just one example of how the inevitable death of newspapers will simply not be the
information apocalypse they’d like you to think it will be.
Dave Title is an expert at the Insight
Community. To get insight and analysis from Dave Title and other experts on challenges your
company faces, click here.
went to universal studios today since alli's parents have never been there! gotta love that
place!! Charles' Twitter: http://twitter.com/CharlesTrippy Alli's Twitter:
http://twitter.com/AlliSpeed My Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/CharlesTrippyFriendcore My
Main/Skit Channel: http://youtube.com/CharlesTrippy Do you want to create an outro for the
vloggity vlogs?! Here is a link to download the theme song for animation! http://bit.ly/oxYRy You
can @reply me or alli a link to what you make on my twitter or email me at
charlestrippy@gmail.com SO WHAT'S THE DEAL WITH THESE VIDEOS? well, a friend of mine (shaycarl)
started doing a video diary for a year. I thought it would be interesting to try and begin one as
well but not just stop at a year (let's go for two, or three!). I think it's really interesting
to be able to look back years (when i'm old and boring) to have proof to be like "look, I was fun
at some point!". So enjoy, subscribe, and keep coming back daily (because they're new videos each
day!) Also, be sure to check out my main/sketch comedy channel http://youtube.com/charlestrippy
Outro Animation By: http://www.youtube.com/ithinkmynameispoop Download the theme song (mp3) by
Charlie Puth here: http://bit.ly/16Pw0j download the theme as a ringtone for your cell:
http://bit.ly/OVp20 then go check him out charlie puth http://youtube.com/charlieottoputh
A website that sorts everyday the most relevant information to you.
Vote for the news and Matoumba will learn your tastes and the information that you like the most.
It is all FREE!
Find here the history of the stories you found interesting.
Show this to people who share the same interests as you,
and if they use Matoumba, their own votes will fine recommandations to you.
When I
was looking over my news feeds yesterday morning, I though I had spied some exciting news. A few
sites were reporting about 
Death is a very dull, dreary affair, and my advice to you is to have nothing whatever to do
with it.-Â Â 
Recommandations
)
and reject those that you are not interested in
(
)
