To display the most relevant entries to you in priority,
vote for the stories you are interested in
(  )
and reject those that you are not interested in
(  )
Zeropaid File Sharing P2P Technology News -
19 hours and 33 minutes ago
Had been trying to force Norwegian ISP Telenor to prevent customer from being able to access
BitTorrent tracker site The Pirate Bay.
It’s been a long time coming, but at last
TONO, a Norwegian royalty collecting group founded back in 1928, and the International
Federation of the Phonographic Industry (IFPI) have given up their bid to force Norwegian ISP
Telenor to prevent subscribers from being able to access BitTorrent tracker site The Pirate Bay.
The affair first began in earnest last March when Telenor refused
to block the Pirate Bay, reminding the copyright holders that “ISPs are not complicit in
the actions of its customers on the Internet.”
Then in November the country’s Norway’s Asker and Bærum District Court
ruled
in favor of Telenor, finding that it is not illegally contributing to any copyright
violations by The Pirate Bay and that there is subsequently no legal basis for forcing it to
block the site.
“Telenor and other Internet providers, including private companies, may have to do an
evaluation on whether an Internet page or service shall be blocked or not,” read the
ruling. “This is an evaluation normally assigned to the authorities, and in the
court’s view, today’s situation makes it unnatural to assign such responsibility to
private companies.”
Fast forward to a few days ago and copyright holders have decided to abandon their plans, opting
not to appeal the case before the Supreme Court.
It is “needless to appeal further,” reads a joint press release.
“We wanted to get a legal clarification on whether the under Norwegian law (it) is possible
to order the internet providers to block access to The Pirate Bay,” said
TONOs Director Cato Strøm. “Now we have two clear decisions that there is no
legal authority in the Norwegian law for such blocking requirements. Both of us intend to forward
the matter to legislators.”
Now that copyright holders have their legal clarification BitTorrent users in Norway can breathe
easier, not that there isn’t a billion ways to circumvent any site blocking technology, but
it’s just that who wants the seconds worth of hassle right?
The game of whac-a-mole continues.
Stay tuned.
jared@zeropaid.com


|
U2Torrents.com’s U2torrents news feed -
1 days and 6 hours ago
A new torrent has been uploaded to U2Torrents.com.
Torrent: 5754
Title: 2001-08-21 Earl's Court, London -- By Request --
Size: 759.96 MB
Category: Elevation
Uploaded by: drewwerd
Description
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is for acrobat269. All other shows from this date are either banned or not on the tracker
anymore.
-Elevation London 3rd Night-
2001-08-21
London
England
Taper : Unknow
Source : Cdr > .cda > dbpowerAmp > .flacf (normal compression)
Setlist:
Cd1
01. Elevation
02. Beautiful Day
03. Until The End Of The World
04. New Year's Day
05. Kite
06. Gone
07. New York
08. 11 O'clock Tick Tock
09. Sunday Bloody Sunday
10. Wake Up Dead Man
11. In A Little While
12. Stuck In A Moment You Can't Get Out Of
13. Stay (Faraway,So Close!)
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Cd2
01. Bad / 40
02. Where The Streets Have No Name
03. Mysterious Ways
04. The Fly
05. Bullet The Blue Sky
06. With Or Without You
07. One
08. When Will I See You Again / Walk On
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You can use the URL below to download the torrent (you may have to login).
http://u2torrents.com/torrents-details.php?id=5754&hit=1
Take care!
Live U2
_________________________________________________________________________________
Disclaimer: Please do not reply to this email account it is NOT monitored.
Please visit the U2torrents.com Help section at http://www.u2torrents.com/help/ for helpful
information or to Ask a Question.

|
InformationWeek RSS Feed -
1 days and 9 hours ago
People have only two more days to submit and vote for ideas about ways government agencies can work
better for them and for the country as a whole.

|
TorrentFreak -
1 days and 12 hours ago
China is
no stranger to Internet censorship. The country’s Great Firewall includes many well known
sites, but up until now BitTorrent sites have never been blocked.
There was a short blocking incident two years ago when Mininova, isoHunt and The Pirate Bay were
hijacked and redirected to the
leading Chinese search engine, Baidu. However, this issue was solved in a matter of days without
an official explanation.
In the years that followed the Chinese government mainly targeted local BitTorrent sites, leaving
the previously mentioned sites unharmed. According to reports from isoHunt’s owner Gary
Fung, this tolerant stance might have changed as visits from China to isoHunt have plunged dramatically.
The drop in traffic is so significant that any technical difficulties have to be ruled out. Last
Saturday, isoHunt had only 1,349 visitors from China compared to 131,362 the week before, a
massive 99% decrease.
Despite the signs that this ban of isoHunt is intentional, there hasn’t been any official
word from the Chinese authorities on the situation. Whether it has anything to do with the recent
P2P site crackdown in
China, where the authorities shut down hundreds of local sites including some of the biggest
BitTorrent trackers, is unknown.
IsoHunt owner Gary Fung told TorrentFreak that he recommends that Chinese users who want to
continue using the site should access it through a foreign proxy. Gary said that China was never
a huge source of traffic for his site, but sees the ban as a “big deal” for the
ongoing net censorship debate.
Although China’s authorities are not known for their democratic principles, speaking out
against the ban might help. “China has flipflopped between site bans, so putting on
pressure and people voicing opinions do matter,” Gary added, referring to China’s
previous banning and unbanning of websites such as Wikipedia.
The Pirate Bay, BTjunkie and all the other major foreign BitTorrent sites are unaffected and
remain accessible in China. For now.
Article from: TorrentFreak, check out our new blog at
FreakBits.

|
PhoenixJP.News -
1 days and 13 hours ago
Ca n'est pas un bon mois pour les chasseurs de P2Pistes. Après
la relaxe d'un éditeur de site de liens P2P espagnols, c'est en Lithuanie que des
ayants droit se sont cassés les dents devant les tribunaux. La LANVA, un organisme de
lutte contre le piratage lithuanien, avait souhaité poursuivre un utilisateur du tracker
BitTorrent LinkoManija.net, très populaire au pays. L'homme était
accusé d'avoir partagé sans autorisation une copie de Windows 7 Ultimate, mais
le juge a préféré l'acquiter devant l'absence de preuve.
[Lire la suite]
|
Mashable! -
1 days and 13 hours ago
When we talk about file-sharing, there’s a whole spectrum of issues that usually
get mixed up or treated as one when they’re really very different things.
Is it OK to borrow an audio CD I just bought? Is it OK to play it to some friends at a party? Can
I convert it into MP3 files or make a copy? Is it fine if I put it in a shared folder of a P2P
application such as eMule?
At the other end of the spectrum, you’ve got creators of P2P apps, owners of link sites
(sites that generally don’t actually host any content, they just link to content that
resides elsewhere) and torrent trackers.
Sometimes, you’ll hear that all of the above are illegal. Often, extreme examples such as
“listening a CD with a friend” will be laughed at (well of course you can do that)
but when it comes to creating a
simple backup copy, it’ll be called a gray zone or even declared illegal.
Very rarely you’ll hear a court decide that linking to copyrighted material is OK, but this
is exactly how Spanish judge Raul N. García Orejudo ruled in a case of Spanish music
collector society SGAE
(Sociedad General de Autores y Editores) vs. Jesus Guerra, owner of link site www.elrincondejesus.com.
Do judge Raul’s arguments make sense? You bet they do. First, he denied SGAE’s request to shut down Guerra’s site in June, saying that
“P2P networks, as a mere transmission of data between Internet users, do not violate, in
principle, any right protected by Intellectual Property Law.”
Now, he decided that “offering an index of links and/or linking to copyright material is
not the same as distribution.” His decision was largely based on the fact that Guerra
doesn’t make any direct or indirect profits off the site.
Without going into the moral side of the story, it’s obvious that there’s not a very
big difference between a site like www.elrincondejesus.com and Google. And if you start
going that road, you end up with weird legal precedents, such as the recent decision by an
Italian court, which found Google Italy execs
guilty over an offensive video Google had failed to remove from its index.
There’s no doubt that SGAE will appeal the decision. But this ruling once again shows that not everything is as black and white in the world of
file-sharing as the recording industry would have you believe.
Reviews: Google
Tags: file sharing, link sites, p2p, Spain


|
Download Squad -
2 days and 7 hours ago
Filed under: Utilities,
P2P
 We told you a
while ago about
uTP, the new self-throttling torrent transfer protocol that first appeared in version 2.0 of
the popular uTorrent app. As Sebastian explained in our previous post, uTP prevents network
congestion by limiting its own bandwidth so that your Internet service provider doesn't have to.
Ideally, this means nobody is subjected to ISP-level torrent throttling, and everybody wins. In
practice, though, uTorrent may be
unfair in a different way: it gives priority to other users who are running the new
protocol.
That's caused several private trackers to boot uTorrent 2 off of their approved clients lists.
Bittorrent Inc., the developers of the uTP protocol, has opened it up so that other torrent clients
can incorporate it. Bittorrent Inc. admits that there might be a "downside to innovation" in this
case, according to
Torrentfreak, but it's working to take uTP mainstream, which would solve the problem. Other
major clients, including Vuze, are already looking at incorporating the protocol into their
software.
Share
uTorrent banned by private trackers for "not playing fair" originally appeared on Download Squad on Mon, 15 Mar 2010 16:00:00 EST. Please see
our terms for use of feeds.
Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments
BitTorrent
- Torrentfreak
-
ΜTorrent -
Internet service provider -
Download Squad

|
Numerama.com - Brèves -
2 days and 9 hours ago
Avec la sortie de la version 2.0 du logiciel le 25 janvier dernier, uTorrent lançait par la
même occasion une nouvelle fonctionnalité très prometteuse, le Micro
Transport Protocol (µTP). Sur le papier, µTP avait un objectif simple :
gérer
plus efficacement les données échangées avec les autres utilisateurs,
sans pour autant affecter la session Internet (navigation web, communication Skype, jeu en
ligne...). Ainsi, le logiciel était censé prévenir la congestion des
réseaux, en réduisant le débit du téléchargement si
nécessaire.
[Lire la suite]
|
|
What is Matoumba?
A website that sorts everyday the most relevant information to you.
Vote for the news and Matoumba will learn your tastes and the information that you like the most.
It is all FREE!
|